The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 569 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Patrick Harvie
I do not know whether any colleagues wish to ask a supplementary question before I—
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Patrick Harvie
No, but I mean that medication needs to be prescribed.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Patrick Harvie
Forgive me, but I am going to pick up again on the difference between those wider support services and diagnosis and treatment. Do you see a role for the third sector or other parts of the non-NHS sector—
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Patrick Harvie
Can I just tease out what you are saying a little bit? You say that you want people to be able to access the support that they need through the NHS without having to resort to going private, but previously you made a distinction between support and diagnosis. Diagnosis might lead to treatment—to a prescription—but support is something different. Support is valuable, but diagnosis and support are two different things. Are you saying that you want everyone to be able to access not only support in the broadest sense, but also diagnosis and, if appropriate, treatment through the NHS?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Patrick Harvie
Given the scale of the demand that you have described, can that be delivered? Or should the Government be looking to provide, for example, more sustainable funding for third sector services that are run on a not-for-profit basis, which could help to expand capacity in a way that is specialised and perhaps more relatable?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Patrick Harvie
Absolutely.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Patrick Harvie
Okay. I beg your pardon.
I wish to move on to discuss the role of the private sector—and a few other members have questions on this theme, too. There are quite a few dimensions to discuss. We have heard concerns from some of the professional bodies about quality, about whether services are being provided to a recognised and agreed standard, and about whether there is too much emphasis on single-condition assessments, which could miss other aspects of a person’s situation.
From the point of view of individuals looking to access services, we have heard about the unfairness in the fact that private sector services will often be very much available to people who are well resourced, while others cannot access them or, in some cases, find themselves going into debt in order to access them. People may also have a frustration that, even if they have accessed a private diagnosis, it does not necessarily lead to access to the treatment that they want through the NHS.
There are also concerns from the third sector’s point of view about “private” being thought of as covering everything that is non-NHS. Although the third sector may be in a position to provide services on a not-for-profit basis—which, ethically, most of us would be more comfortable with—and although third sector organisations may often work in a way that is rooted within the lived experience of people who have greater familiarity with the issues, that does not necessarily come with stable funding, which can leave organisations feeling taken advantage of in terms of what they can deliver.
Thinking about all of those aspects, what, in short, do you think should be the role of the private sector or of non-NHS provision? Do you want that to be expanded? Do you want such provision to be brought into the NHS, so that the NHS is providing for people’s needs and people do not have to resort to the private sector? Where should things be going?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Patrick Harvie
I am not seeking to take away from the value and importance of that at all. However, we have heard a significant number of voices say that diagnosis is hugely important for a range of reasons, including access to prescription medication in certain circumstances. I am not yet hearing from the Government how it intends to meet what you, yourself, are describing as a substantial demand that is currently unmet.
09:45Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Patrick Harvie
—in meeting the need for diagnosis and treatment, as opposed to wider support?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Patrick Harvie
I know that other members want to come in on this theme. My last question is this: by what time—what date—do you think that moving to the different model that you have described is going to make a substantial difference to people who are currently left waiting or feeling forced to go to private providers if they have the money to do so?