The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 310 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2023
James Dornan
Yes. As Mr Pybus said, those under 25 may
“get less money, yet their energy bills are exactly the same.”—[Official Report, Social Justice and Social Security Committee, 22 September 2022; c 31.]
Has the Scottish Government carried out any analysis of the impact of the UK Government welfare policies on poverty levels in Scotland?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 19 January 2023
James Dornan
Good morning, cabinet secretary and officials.
Almost all the budget growth in this portfolio is from the £1.2 billion—30 per cent—increase to the forecast spend in social security benefits, which is mainly a result of an increase for personal independence payment and ADP, the increase to Scottish child payment and the increase in benefits in line with inflation.
Can you tell me a bit more about why the Scottish Government made those choices? Why did it decide to increase benefits in line with inflation and increase the Scottish child payment by 150 per cent? Why is it spending more on ADP in comparison with what was spent on PIP?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 22 December 2022
James Dornan
That is extraordinary. Does that change the estimate of how much more ADP will cost compared with continuing with PIP?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 22 December 2022
James Dornan
I have some questions about the processing times for the Scottish child payment. What is the current processing time for applications received since—[Inaudible.]
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 22 December 2022
James Dornan
It is coming up to Christmas—maybe Santa can help. Thanks very much for that response.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 22 December 2022
James Dornan
It has been more than a year since the launch of your local delivery service. How is that going? What have you learned? How involved have the local delivery teams been in the continuous improvement theme?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 22 December 2022
James Dornan
The SFC has talked about forecasts of increasing numbers of applications for disability benefits. Are there similar trends in Scotland to those in the rest of the UK?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 22 December 2022
James Dornan
Pretty much. What has the time been since the benefit was extended on 14 November?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 22 December 2022
James Dornan
Is there any obvious way for you to improve the processing times or to help clients to track progress on their applications? For example, it has been mentioned that an online app or account might help with that. Would that improve things? If so, would you implement it?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 15 December 2022
James Dornan
Thanks for that answer. Is it possible that the reason that most respondents to the consultation—I think that it was 76 per cent—agreed with breaking the link to the cold weather payment is precisely because a large group of people who could have done with that support have previously missed out? Can the minister outline how the feedback from stakeholders influenced the development of the policy? For example, was the inherent unfairness in the CWP the primary reason that the Scottish Government decided to break the link with it?
09:30