Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 6 August 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3461 contributions

|

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 12 June 2024

Jackson Carlaw

We will incorporate that into the request of the Scottish Government and see whether it can give further insight into the best body to ask for that information. With the addition of Mr Choudhury’s suggestion that we seek to establish what barriers people face, are members content to proceed as suggested?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 12 June 2024

Jackson Carlaw

We will close petition on that basis. I thank Maria Aitken for having raised the issue with the Parliament.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 12 June 2024

Jackson Carlaw

PE1976, which has been lodged by Derek James Brown, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to require council tax discounts for dementia to be backdated to the date on which a person was certified as being severely mentally impaired, when they then go on to qualify for a relevant benefit.

We discussed the petition last autumn, on 20 September, and we agreed to write to the Scottish Government. The response states that a draft severe mental impairment application form was presented to the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities in an effort to encourage

“all 32 local authorities to adopt a common approach to administering a disregard for persons suffering from Severe Mental Impairment.”

Officials are now continuing to engage with COSLA on that issue.

Alzheimer Scotland’s submission states its view that the requirement for applicants to be eligible for a qualifying benefit is “unfair and unnecessary”, and it advocates for the Scottish Government to remedy the issue. Do members have any suggestions about how we might proceed on the petition?

10:30  

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 12 June 2024

Jackson Carlaw

So the application normally comes in, and that is it.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 12 June 2024

Jackson Carlaw

By whom?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 12 June 2024

Jackson Carlaw

Do members agree to combine Mr Choudhury’s suggestion that we write to ministers with the proposal that we close the petition? Does that meet the committee’s approval?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 12 June 2024

Jackson Carlaw

We will keep the petition open; I thank the petitioners for raising the issue. We will proceed as I set out in the first instance, and I expect that we might potentially take further evidence on the issue later in the year.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 12 June 2024

Jackson Carlaw

I take your point that the Scottish Government did not really address the issues of the petition in its initial response. I also take your point about drawing attention to the Scottish Government’s own homework as evidence of anything. It would be surprising if the Scottish Government came back and said that it did not think that it had been doing a good job or that the whole thing was not a stunning success—that does not tend to be what Government reports on its own homework do. Therefore, there is nothing particularly independent in the character of that.

Should the committee be quite strong in the recommendation that the Scottish Government should respond seriously to the issue that the petitioner has raised and that an independent voice should be appointed to conduct a review of the petition?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Decision on Taking Business in Private

Meeting date: 12 June 2024

Jackson Carlaw

Good morning, and welcome to the 11th meeting in 2024 of the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee.

Our colleague Fergus Ewing will join us shortly. He is at a breakfast meeting in the Parliament and will come along to proceedings as soon as that has concluded.

The first item on our agenda is, as always, the technical one, which is simply for colleagues to agree that we will take in private agenda item 4, which is consideration of evidence that we will hear. Are members content to take item 4 in private?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 12 June 2024

Jackson Carlaw

That is why I am genuinely confused. If there is a presumption of truth and no evidence to suggest that there was parental consent, and they are saying that there was no parental consent, then why are they not believed, since that criterion would have made them eligible?