The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3461 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Jackson Carlaw
We will incorporate that into the request of the Scottish Government and see whether it can give further insight into the best body to ask for that information. With the addition of Mr Choudhury’s suggestion that we seek to establish what barriers people face, are members content to proceed as suggested?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Jackson Carlaw
We will close petition on that basis. I thank Maria Aitken for having raised the issue with the Parliament.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Jackson Carlaw
PE1976, which has been lodged by Derek James Brown, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to require council tax discounts for dementia to be backdated to the date on which a person was certified as being severely mentally impaired, when they then go on to qualify for a relevant benefit.
We discussed the petition last autumn, on 20 September, and we agreed to write to the Scottish Government. The response states that a draft severe mental impairment application form was presented to the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities in an effort to encourage
“all 32 local authorities to adopt a common approach to administering a disregard for persons suffering from Severe Mental Impairment.”
Officials are now continuing to engage with COSLA on that issue.
Alzheimer Scotland’s submission states its view that the requirement for applicants to be eligible for a qualifying benefit is “unfair and unnecessary”, and it advocates for the Scottish Government to remedy the issue. Do members have any suggestions about how we might proceed on the petition?
10:30Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Jackson Carlaw
So the application normally comes in, and that is it.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Jackson Carlaw
By whom?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Do members agree to combine Mr Choudhury’s suggestion that we write to ministers with the proposal that we close the petition? Does that meet the committee’s approval?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Jackson Carlaw
We will keep the petition open; I thank the petitioners for raising the issue. We will proceed as I set out in the first instance, and I expect that we might potentially take further evidence on the issue later in the year.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Jackson Carlaw
I take your point that the Scottish Government did not really address the issues of the petition in its initial response. I also take your point about drawing attention to the Scottish Government’s own homework as evidence of anything. It would be surprising if the Scottish Government came back and said that it did not think that it had been doing a good job or that the whole thing was not a stunning success—that does not tend to be what Government reports on its own homework do. Therefore, there is nothing particularly independent in the character of that.
Should the committee be quite strong in the recommendation that the Scottish Government should respond seriously to the issue that the petitioner has raised and that an independent voice should be appointed to conduct a review of the petition?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Good morning, and welcome to the 11th meeting in 2024 of the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee.
Our colleague Fergus Ewing will join us shortly. He is at a breakfast meeting in the Parliament and will come along to proceedings as soon as that has concluded.
The first item on our agenda is, as always, the technical one, which is simply for colleagues to agree that we will take in private agenda item 4, which is consideration of evidence that we will hear. Are members content to take item 4 in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Jackson Carlaw
That is why I am genuinely confused. If there is a presumption of truth and no evidence to suggest that there was parental consent, and they are saying that there was no parental consent, then why are they not believed, since that criterion would have made them eligible?