The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3813 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Jackson Carlaw
The graphics on your screen came around the right way eventually, so we can now see them without needing a scribe. Thank you very much for joining us.
I suspend the meeting briefly while we change witnesses.
10:22 Meeting suspended.Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Jackson Carlaw
We will continue taking evidence on PE2099, which is on stopping the proposed centralisation of specialist neonatal units in NHS Scotland. For the second evidence session this morning, I am delighted to welcome Jim Crombie, co-chair of the perinatal sub-group of the best start implementation programme board; and Dr Andrew Murray, co-chair of the perinatal sub-group. Are there two co-chairs, or are there other co-chairs who are not with us?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Jackson Carlaw
I meant the ScotSTAR service itself. At the moment there are eight centres, but if there were only three, might the call on that resource, for transferring people to just three centres that are further away, be greater than is case at present, when there are eight?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Fine. Thank you very much.
Could you give us clarity on the intention of the best start report with regard to the final number of units? Obviously, we have eight, and there was a recommendation to move to between three and five, and the recommendation ended up at three. The committee is concerned to know whether there is scope to move beyond that figure of three towards the five that was within the range of parameters that were discussed.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Jackson Carlaw
What about the question whether there should be three, four or five units?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jackson Carlaw
That was very helpful. I am sure that it will help inform colleagues as we proceed.
We have been joined by our parliamentary colleagues Tess White, Ruth Maguire and Rachael Hamilton. After the committee has asked questions, time permitting, I hope to invite them to ask questions that they might feel have not been properly addressed.
Chief constable, I listened to all of your statement with interest and care, and I am grateful for it, but was there an underlying admission in there that Police Scotland got something wrong? If so, why?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you, minister. We are at the stage in the political cycle when we are drawing our work together and looking for outcomes, because the parliamentary session ends in March.
Speaking on a personal level, I applaud the proactive engagement that you have had with David Hill’s parents, Rodger and Sharon, as well as with James Bundy and his family. The petitions were motivated by particularly personal tragic circumstances, and I know that you have invested a degree of time in engaging with them and consulting them as the way in which the Government might react and proceed has evolved. We are now at the business end of the various petitions before us.
I will start on the subject of defibrillator access, usage and community response. The public access defibrillator placement map has identified gaps. There is fantastically widespread availability, and we can see how much that has grown, as you outlined, in the course of this session of the Parliament. One of the interesting things to note is that some defibrillators do not get used very much, whereas others get used more often. That is interesting, as it points to the importance of placement and where everything should ultimately be.
People still largely rely on community fundraising and generous external sponsorship, and that has been a successful strategy, in that it has allowed for the defibrillators that we currently have to be located where they are. However, for more deprived communities—we can see them on the map, in Glasgow and the west of Scotland—is that a reasonable approach that will allow us to avoid having a postcode lottery? I am interested in how the Government plans to plug that gap. Is it through direct intervention and support, or is it through cajoling people or trying to identify people who might be available to lead efforts in communities or who might be generous enough to sponsor units in those places? Clearly, we do not want people who live in areas where there is a gap in provision to have less chance of surviving than those who live in areas where provision has been more obviously achieved.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jackson Carlaw
What causes you to hesitate on the BE FAST programme, minister?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Yes. Notwithstanding the wall of negativity that we have received from officialdom, with a view to penetrating that wall with further efforts, are members content to keep the petition open?
Members indicated agreement.
Concessionary Bus Travel Scheme (Asylum Seekers) (PE2028)
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Noted.
Are colleagues content?
Members indicated agreement.
12:00