Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 12 August 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3461 contributions

|

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Jackson Carlaw

Are colleagues content for us to write to the minister on the basis that we have considered the petition afresh and come reluctantly to the view that there is no more that the committee can do, but that is in the light of the specific commitments that we have received from the Scottish Government and the committee’s unanimous view that those commitments should be fulfilled during this session of Parliament?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Jackson Carlaw

I thank Jasmin-Kasaya Pilling and the others who have been involved in the petition. Their focus and the evidence that they gave us persuaded the committee of the case. In closing the petition, we will write to the minister in the terms that we have suggested to ensure that the commitment that we have received is fulfilled. Given the limited time that we now have in this parliamentary session, we will emphasise in writing again to the petitioner that, if that does not happen, as part of the legacy from this session to the next, we hope that a fresh petition can be raised with reference to the work that was done.

Are colleagues content to act on that basis?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Jackson Carlaw

We considered a petition on that subject at our previous meeting, and I wrote to the minister—or, at least, I wrote to somebody—with Mr Ewing’s suggestion about how funds could usefully be transferred from elsewhere.

Does Mr Torrance’s proposal meet the acceptance of the committee?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Jackson Carlaw

It seems invidious that Scottish schools are now behind the standard that is being set elsewhere around the UK and that four in 10 schools—the figure might be slightly higher—would not, in the event that an emergency occurred, have access to life-saving equipment that has a proven track record. I have seen such equipment being deployed, and I know that other colleagues have heard of instances of its deployment in which lives have been saved as a result.

Are colleagues content to support Mr Torrance’s recommendation?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Jackson Carlaw

Thank you very much, Mr MacGregor. I also thank your constituent for submitting her petition, which raises issues for the committee to consider. Do colleagues have any suggestions as to how we might proceed?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Jackson Carlaw

If I could just interrupt you on that point, Mr Torrance. In that letter to the Scottish Government, we could draw on some of the additional suggestions that might be made to it from Mr MacGregor’s evidence as well.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Jackson Carlaw

Thank you. Are there any other comments or suggestions from colleagues?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Jackson Carlaw

Thank you. That brings us to the end of the open session this morning. We will take item 4 in private. The committee will meet again on Wednesday 9 October.

10:37 Meeting continued in private until 10:58.  

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Decision on Taking Business in Private

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Jackson Carlaw

Good morning, and welcome to the 14th meeting in 2024 of the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee. Agenda item 1 is to agree to take in private item 4, which is consideration of our draft report on the A9. Are members content to take item 4 in private?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 25 September 2024

Jackson Carlaw

Under agenda item 2, we have five continued petitions to consider, the first of which is PE1856, lodged by Pat Rafferty on behalf of Unite the union. The petition calls on the Parliament to protect the future of the taxi trade by providing financial support to taxi drivers, setting up a national stakeholder group with trade union driver representatives and reviewing low-emission standards and implementation dates.

Transport Scotland has confirmed that a meeting was initiated and facilitated by Glasgow City Council with Unite, the Energy Saving Trust and Transport Scotland. Colleagues will remember that we held an evidence session with representatives from the Scottish Taxi Federation in relation to the issues raised in this petition and, I think, another one that we had at the same time.

Glasgow City Council’s recent written submission states that it received 776 applications for a temporary exemption to the enforcement of the low-emission zone. All 776 requests were granted. In short, all taxi operators who applied received the requested exemption. In February this year, conditions were agreed for those who may require an extension beyond the agreed year. Glasgow City Council granted 225 extensions to the exemption and notes that it will continue to show flexibility to operators who are making efforts towards compliance, should that be required.

In relation to the issues that we discussed, I think that a reasonably pragmatic approach was secured. In light of that, do members have any suggestions as to how we might proceed?