The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3280 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Jackson Carlaw
So the application normally comes in, and that is it.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Jackson Carlaw
By whom?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Do members agree to combine Mr Choudhury’s suggestion that we write to ministers with the proposal that we close the petition? Does that meet the committee’s approval?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Jackson Carlaw
We will keep the petition open; I thank the petitioners for raising the issue. We will proceed as I set out in the first instance, and I expect that we might potentially take further evidence on the issue later in the year.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Jackson Carlaw
I take your point that the Scottish Government did not really address the issues of the petition in its initial response. I also take your point about drawing attention to the Scottish Government’s own homework as evidence of anything. It would be surprising if the Scottish Government came back and said that it did not think that it had been doing a good job or that the whole thing was not a stunning success—that does not tend to be what Government reports on its own homework do. Therefore, there is nothing particularly independent in the character of that.
Should the committee be quite strong in the recommendation that the Scottish Government should respond seriously to the issue that the petitioner has raised and that an independent voice should be appointed to conduct a review of the petition?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Good morning, and welcome to the 11th meeting in 2024 of the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee.
Our colleague Fergus Ewing will join us shortly. He is at a breakfast meeting in the Parliament and will come along to proceedings as soon as that has concluded.
The first item on our agenda is, as always, the technical one, which is simply for colleagues to agree that we will take in private agenda item 4, which is consideration of evidence that we will hear. Are members content to take item 4 in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Jackson Carlaw
I will just say in conclusion that your empathy with the position that people find themselves in is apparent from the evidence that you have given. I am very grateful to you for everything that you have volunteered to us. As Mr Ewing said, and as you have almost said, the responsibility maybe lies with the committee to be much more directional with the Scottish Government in our findings on these matters. However, I am grateful to you for everything that you have volunteered this morning.
Is there anything further that you would like to say that you feel has not emerged during our conversation?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Jackson Carlaw
In that case, thank you both very much. We agreed to consider the evidence that we have heard later. In the meantime, I suspend the meeting briefly to allow everyone to settle.
10:21 Meeting suspended.Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Jackson Carlaw
I also note that 78 per cent of land managers in Perth and Kinross were against a national park. At present, the issue that probably has most traction in the minds of many people is that of the Flamingo Land park, which is being proposed within the national park in that area. Something like 94,000 people have objected. People then wonder just exactly what the basis of a national park is. I suppose that it is open to the committee, through our interrogation of other witnesses beyond even the petitioners, to potentially establish an independent assessment of how these matters are progressing.
Are colleagues content to write to the Scottish Government in the first instance, on the basis that Mr Ewing has suggested?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2024
Jackson Carlaw
We proceed with our consideration of continuing petitions. The next petition is PE1877, whch has been lodged by Alex Wallace and calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to provide body cameras for all front-line national health service staff and paramedics in Scotland.
When we previously considered the petition, we agreed to write to the Scottish Ambulance Service to request information about the outcome of its evaluation of a trial of body cameras. The Scottish Ambulance Service’s response explains that a plan was being developed to trial body camera equipment; however, it did not progress to a live trial because of staff concerns. The submission states that
“The full purchase and roll out of equipment ... would likely attract a capital cost in excess of £1,500,000 and a recurring revenue cost of around £400,000”.
As a result of the cost and staff concerns, the work on body cameras has been “paused” by the Scottish Ambulance Service. In the light of that, what action do members feel that we might consider taking?