The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4270 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jackson Carlaw
You will be aware of the experience in Italy, which has had, for a long time, screening for those who are involved in sport, and it has led to an astonishing 89 per cent reduction in the number of young people who have subsequently died of cardiac failure. I take it that that is part of the subject of the review. That seems to be a compelling success story for that country, particularly for the families of those whose children are with us still, as opposed to elsewhere and here, where that is not the case.
It is sometimes difficult to quantify the numbers in relation to those who are screened, but it seems to me that screening places a premium value on the life of young people, particularly at an age when we know that they are more likely to engage in that kind of sport. The committee was very impressed with that.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jackson Carlaw
I hope that the commitment on behalf of the UK Government does not prove to be a cross that you have to bear and subsequently repent in relation to.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jackson Carlaw
On the basis of Mr Ewing’s recommendation, do colleagues have any comments or suggestions?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jackson Carlaw
And potentially with his own MSP, because that does seem a little discourteous. Are we otherwise content to close the petition?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jackson Carlaw
The final continued petition for consideration today is PE2133, on which members will have received some late submissions. The petition, which was lodged by Andrew Wedge, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to ensure that all cities in Scotland have a direct express rail connection to each other by expanding ScotRail’s Inter7city routes to include Scotland’s newest city, Dunfermline.
Again, we last considered the petition on 19 March. We wanted to find out whether the position of the proposal to reopen the Alloa to Dunfermline line for passenger services would be reviewed in the light of a significant housing development in the west Fife area. We also asked what consideration had been given to using existing connections to provide rail services linking Dunfermline with Glasgow and Stirling without the need to go to Edinburgh.
The response from Transport Scotland indicates that there remains a path for regional or local rail projects to come forward, subject to a strong business case and suitable funding. If sufficient future travel demand from west Fife is identified, Transport Scotland would consider that within the appropriately developed business case.
On the second point, the response explains that the railway in Fife is not yet electrified, so any direct services between Fife and Glasgow would need to run diesel trains on a mostly electrified route. That would have a negative impact on speeds and reliability. Transport Scotland suggests that the question of a direct service could be revisited once the partial electrification of the Fife route is more advanced.
Members may recall that the Scottish Government’s position on the ask of the petition is that it is reasonable, that it was given detailed consideration in recent years and that rail connectivity in Fife will be kept under review as travel patterns evolve.
Are there any suggestions for how we might proceed?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Item 4 is consideration of new petitions. As always, before we consider a new petition, I make the point to those following today’s proceedings that a considerable amount of work is done in advance of our consideration of petitions. Before a petition’s first consideration, we seek an initial view from the Scottish Government and receive a briefing from the Parliament’s independent research body, SPICe—the Scottish Parliament information centre. That information enables us to properly consider the issues raised by the petition. Previously, we used to meet and then suggest that those two things happen.
The committee is now looking to where we feel that we can make significant progress on behalf of a petition before the end of the parliamentary session.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Those two questions volunteer themselves, given that there is an interest in officials investigating those matters. There is progress that we could make on the petition in the time that is left to us in this parliamentary session.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jackson Carlaw
I think that that is a perfectly reasonable thing for us to do. We will illustrate why the issue is important, again within the context of the review that might take place.
Are colleagues content to keep the petition open and proceed with the investigation on that basis?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Are members content with that?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Good morning, and welcome to the 17th meeting in 2025 of the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee. Under agenda item 1, do we agree to take items 5 and 6 in private? Item 6 is consideration of our work programme.
Members indicated agreement.