The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3280 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Jackson Carlaw
PE2136, lodged by Fiona Drouet, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to make non-fatal strangulation a stand-alone criminal offence in Scotland. As I said earlier, we are joined by our colleague Tess White.
We last considered the petition on 19 March, when we agreed to write to the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Home Affairs, inviting her to give evidence on the petition at a future meeting once a response had been received. The cabinet secretary’s response states that officials have had discussions with operational partners on the petition and will continue to engage with stakeholders, including the petitioner. The cabinet secretary outlines the range of crime types under which a physical attack involving non-fatal strangulation could be recorded, including attempted murder, serious assault, common assault, robbery, rape or attempted rape, and sexual assault. The submission states that, where non-fatal strangulation is present within sexual offending, that will be reflected in the prosecutorial action taken.
The response informs us that there is currently no individual marking used to record and monitor instances of non-fatal strangulation being reported as part of an offence. Similarly, regarding convictions, there appears to be no specific charge code for common assault when non-fatal strangulation is a component of the offence.
We have also been made aware that the Criminal Justice Committee, subject to final agreement at its meeting this morning, is planning to take oral evidence from a number of bodies on the issue of non-fatal strangulation. In the circumstances, a viable option for the committee is to refer the petition to the Criminal Justice Committee, which is planning to take evidence on the issues that it raises.
Before I seek the views of committee colleagues, I invite Tess White to address the committee.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Well, I hope that that actually will be the committee’s recommendation. Thank you very much, Tess White. Do colleagues have any suggestions for action?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Jackson Carlaw
I rather took that point from Jillian Gibson’s earlier statement. I will come to you now, Jillian. It seems that, although you are grateful for the support of all the political parties, you feel that, unless something happens, the immediate prognosis could be one of reversal rather than progress. We have to be realistic and alert to that when we are considering the issue. What are your final thoughts?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Jackson Carlaw
I am struck by a couple of points in that comment. The council-owned swimming pool in my Eastwood constituency is about to be replaced by a completely new community infrastructure development with a pool and theatre, whereas, in other areas, assets are just being axed without any replacement programme. We will come on to discuss that idea and what the consequences of that might be for the sportspeople of the future.
You touched on the fact that we have the highest rate of drownings in the UK—it is almost twice the UK average. Has that always been the case? Is there a deteriorating trend, or is that an emerging statistic? Would all those deaths have been avoided if people had known how to swim, or are we talking in some cases about people getting caught up in a force majeure that would have been impossible for them to survive? I suppose that, if they had known how to swim, they would have had an opportunity to survive. I am interested in understanding where that statistic sits and what might underpin it.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Good morning, and welcome to the seventh meeting in 2025 of the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee. We have received apologies from Foysol Choudhury, who is unable to join us this morning. Our colleague Fergus Ewing joins us online from Inverness, and our colleague Maurice Golden is en route from another committee that has been meeting this morning. I thank everyone for their forbearance in allowing a slightly later start, to enable him to arrive here.
The first item on the agenda is a rather dry item: it is a decision for David Torrance, Fergus Ewing and me on whether to consider in private any evidence that we might hear this morning, under agenda items 4 and 5. Are we content to take items 4 and 5 in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you for your comprehensive set of recommendations. I can see that the clerks have been scribbling furiously as they try to keep up with the various additional thoughts about how we might proceed.
Do members agree keep the petition open and proceed as suggested?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Jackson Carlaw
That draws to a conclusion our consideration of the petition in this session of Parliament.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Duncan, do you want to say something?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Jackson Carlaw
To whom does that percentage apply?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Jackson Carlaw
I will bring in David Torrance to take us forward, but I think that he would like to start by following up on the area that we have just been discussing.