The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3280 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
We move to PE1988, which was lodged by Sue Wallis. The petition calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to review the process for allowing raw sewage discharge from homes into Scottish coastal waters, to provide additional funding to the Scottish Environment Protection Agency for enforcement, and to introduce legislation to ban households from discharging raw sewage.
We last considered the petition in December 2023, when we agreed to write to the Scottish Government. Its response to the committee reiterates SEPA’s approach to regulation. The submission highlights two consultations, the first of which relates to proposals for an integrated environmental authorisation framework. The second consultation sought views on the regulation of private wastewater treatment systems to protect the environment.
The petitioner’s written submission states that the response from the Scottish Government provides a circular argument and does not provide more insight on regulation, as requested by the committee. She notes SEPA’s requirement to contribute to improving the health and wellbeing of people in Scotland and argues that the responses to the petition from both SEPA and the Scottish Government have not addressed that point. The petitioner states that all responses and strategies have focused entirely on environmental issues, to the exclusion of other linked duties.
Do members have any comments or suggestions for action?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Mr Torrance has made a couple of suggestions. Do we agree to keep the petition open and to pursue the suggested course of action?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Please be brief.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
There is a moral there in many different ways.
Mr Carson, you have been listening patiently to the evidence. Before I draw this witness panel’s consideration to an end, I wonder whether you would like to say anything.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
We will move on to our fourth theme, which is forthcoming legislation on national parks and a potential national parks statement, including the implications of pursuing reform and designation on a twin track.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Mhairi Dawson, the NFUS has said that
“existing national parks have failed to make a positive contribution to farming and crofting.”
What made you draw that conclusion?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Okay. What you conclude from that is that you feel that the evidence base is subjective rather than objective and that, for want of a better description, NatureScot is cherry picking in where it is looking to find its evidence, rather than drawing that evidence out from the broadest possible base.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Mhairi Dawson, I will follow up on one of your responses to David Torrance, when you got almost quite emotional and passionate about the division that the issue has created. Will you illustrate how that has manifested?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Are members content with that?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
What evidence is available on the environmental and socioeconomic impacts that the existing national parks have been able to generate? That seems to be one of the issues relating to the parks. Did any of the evidence that existed inform the development of this proposal? Where there was no evidence, where was the information about and support for the proposal drawn from?