The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3280 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
We will keep the petition open and pursue it on that basis.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
That concludes our consideration of new petitions. Our next meeting will be on 13 November. We now move into private session to consider agenda items 4 and 5.
12:34 Meeting continued in private until 12:45.Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Welcome back to this meeting of the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee. We continue our evidence taking in relation to PE2089, which is a petition to stop the creation of more national parks in Scotland. Following the evidence that we heard from our previous witnesses, we have been joined by Rob Lucas of the Galloway National Park Association and John Mayhew of the Scottish Campaign for National Parks. I extend a very warm welcome to both of you.
I say again that our colleague Finlay Carson is sitting in on the discussion of the petition this morning.
We will move straight to questions. We have four themes. I do not know whether you were able to watch or hear any of the evidence that we took from the first panel, but our questions will be on similar themes.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
The next continued petition, PE1993, which was lodged by David Grimm and Lucy Challoner, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to ensure that social work students have access to adequate financial support during their studies by providing bursaries to all third and fourth-year undergraduate social work students on work placements, and to reform the assessment criteria and adequately fund the bursaries for postgraduate social work students on work placements.
We last considered the petition on 20 December, when we agreed to write to the Scottish Social Services Council and the Minister for Higher and Further Education; and Minister for Veterans. The minister’s response to the committee highlights that, from this academic year,
“postgraduate students who are not eligible to receive bursary support from the Scottish Social Services Council ... will be able to apply for the postgraduate funding package administered by the Student Awards Agency Scotland (SAAS).”
The response also highlights the Scottish Social Services Council’s new model and schedule of rates for the financial support that it provides to postgraduate students. It has also worked to increase clarity for students on the funding that they will receive if they are eligible for a bursary; to reduce the complexity of assessments; and to streamline the administrative processes.
The Social Work Education Partnership commissioned a review of practice learning funding, which reported in September 2023. The minister’s written submission states that the “recommendations are being considered” by the Scottish Government. The Scottish Social Services Council’s written submission states that an action plan is
“being drafted by the SWEP Programme Office”.
The petitioners are concerned that the minister is not taking ownership of the issue. Their submission states that
“it is unfair to try and palm off decision making onto others”,
and that
“the Government will need to make funding available to enable this policy to happen”.
Do colleagues have any suggestions for action?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
You make an interesting point about whether national parks themselves are the catalyst for additional tourism. There are other factors, too; for instance, you could point to American television series such as “Outlander” and the tourism that comes from people visiting those destinations. However, when it comes to the whole idea of creating a national park, is it not implicit that such a park will, in the public mind, be somewhere that we should all go to? It might not depend on this, but, by making somewhere a national park, do we not almost self-promote the concept that this is somewhere that tourists should consider upping themselves off to?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Given that the national parks have been in place for a couple of decades now, is a review not a perfectly reasonable proposition?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
You will have heard the evidence from the previous witnesses, some of whom felt that there needs to be an independent review of the national parks, over and above any review that is being conducted by NatureScot. One of the witnesses referred to Mr Ewing’s contribution when we first considered the petition, when he spoke about people marking their own homework and about the fact that NatureScot is a proponent of what is now being advocated in relation to an additional national park, such that there is not public confidence that there has been an independently generated and proper understanding of the benefits and lessons in creating any future national park. What is your attitude to the petitioner’s calls for such an independent review to be established?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Are colleagues content to proceed on that basis?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Mr Carson, we are quite tight for time, but I can allow you a question if you can pull your thoughts together concisely.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Does anyone want to come in on that point?