The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4270 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Jackson Carlaw
Do colleagues agree that we should take those actions forward?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you. I will make a couple of points before I bring in colleagues. Although I talked about the petitions being quite technically varied, community engagement is an underlying theme, which is sometimes prominent and sometimes discrete.
In relation to outages as a result of last week’s weather event, you said that, mercifully, we have been much more fortunate than we were a year ago. Was that in any way due to resilience planning in the interim, or were we just luckier this time than we were the previous time we had bad weather?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Jackson Carlaw
Before you continue, does Fergus Ewing want to come in on that issue?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Jackson Carlaw
It would be dangerous for us to broaden the scope of our inquiry at this stage, but we should very much focus on getting results from the issues that we have made progress on. Given that the review took place at the end of the year, there is still a chance for us to get further commitment before the Parliament dissolves. Are we content to proceed on that basis?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Jackson Carlaw
Are members content to close the petition?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Jackson Carlaw
Okay. We raised the matters with the minister, who supports some of the petition’s aims, so it is a case of demonstrating progress.
Do colleagues support the recommendation?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Jackson Carlaw
This is another painful petition that we have wrestled with over the lifetime of the Parliament, but, given the situation that we are in, do colleagues support the proposal?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Jackson Carlaw
Item 4 is the consideration of new petitions.
Before I introduce the first of our new petitions, I begin, as I always do, by noting that the Scottish Government is invited to express a view on new petitions and that we ask the Scottish Parliament information centre—the Scottish Parliament’s independent research service—to bottom out issues that are raised in the petitions that are before us.
As I explained earlier in the meeting, the committee’s current focus is to identify issues that we feel that we can make significant progress on before the end of the parliamentary session. There are only six meetings of the committee left, and the agenda for most of them is already set.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you for that reflection on the various responses that were received in respect of this petition. Are colleagues content with the recommendation, as put to the committee?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Can I pursue that a little further in the context of my meetings with parents in Wishaw? The parents spoke about the situation that might develop for other parents post the implementation of these changes. We are talking here about families in extremis because we are talking about the sickest child. One parent said that his wife was left in a life-threatening state after the birth of the baby and that, had the new model been in place, he would have been left with an invidious choice, with his wife and child being not at the same hospital but potentially one being in Aberdeen and one being in the local hospital. There are also siblings in the family. In listening to those people talk about the family-centred care package, I noticed that those other responsibilities do not seem to necessarily be accommodated within the thinking of those who are offering support.
Does yet more work need to be done on what is provided within family-centred care? Clearly, it might be that accommodation and travel costs are covered but parents may have other children and there could be a need to provide emergency childcare to support that family in those circumstances. That does not seem to be part of the package at the moment. I think that when parents said that they did not feel supported enough, they felt that although there are provisions to meet some of the emergency financial pressures that they were faced with, there is not the comprehensive level of support that they felt would be helpful. In the conversations with parent groups, has that all been teased out? Could the provision be made as easy as possible to access in such circumstances for families in extremis—and in an unplanned way, obviously, rather than a planned situation where people can anticipate that they might be going to be in a hospital further away from where they might have expected?