The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3584 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Jackson Carlaw
PE1845 was lodged by Gordon Baird on behalf of Galloway community hospital action group. Rhoda Grant again joins us to discuss the petition, which calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to create an agency to ensure that health boards offer fair and reasonable management of rural and remote healthcare issues.
When we last discussed the petition on 8 September, we agreed to write to the Scottish Government and the remote and rural general practice short-life working group, as well as to rural health boards. We have received various submissions from stakeholders and a late submission from Finlay Carson MSP, all of which have been shared with members.
The chair of the remote and rural general practice short-life working group highlights its recent report and its recommendation that a national centre of excellence for remote and rural health and social care be established. Work on implementing the recommendation is under way, including work to explore the potential role of a rural health commissioner, which is a position that has been successfully established in Australia.
The responses from NHS Shetland and NHS Orkney and from NHS Grampian provide information on their respective approaches to public engagement. We have also received a further submission from the petitioner, which is included in full in members’ papers, and a submission from Claire Fleming in support of the petition.
Before the committee comes to a view on what to do next, I ask Rhoda Grant whether she wants to say anything.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Jackson Carlaw
That has been very helpful. I thank you for your persistence in pursuing the petition.
We will see HIAL on 18 May, so we will be able to pursue some of your specific questions with the organisation then. I thank you for your time this morning, Mr Henderson.
09:57 Meeting suspended.Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Welcome back. We move to our second witness on PE1804, on HIAL’s plans. I am delighted to welcome David Avery, from Prospect, whose name has been referred to and brought up numerous times in our deliberations. You are very welcome to the meeting.
We have read Prospect’s most recent response to events in our papers ahead of this morning’s session, so we will move straight to questions.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Yes. Some of the complexities that the Royal College of Pathologists details seem to be issues that will have been faced and addressed elsewhere.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Jackson Carlaw
My final question sits on the back of evidence that we have received. What evidence do you have that the Civil Aviation Authority would authorise anything that was unsafe?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Jackson Carlaw
It is plain from the subsequent submissions that you have made that concerns were expressed. What was HIAL’s response to and management of those concerns like?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Jackson Carlaw
How should HIAL have approached the development of the project in the first place?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Implicit in that suggestion is that we are at a point when, in other circumstances, we would hear from the petitioner.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Jackson Carlaw
I invite our two parliamentary colleagues who have joined us and have been with us at various stages during our consideration of the petition over an extended period to ask you anything.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 4 May 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Does Prospect retain confidence in HIAL and its existing board?