The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3461 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Jackie Baillie has a quick supplementary.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Jackie Baillie has a supplementary supplementary. Be very brief, please.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Jackson Carlaw
That has been stated. I feel in my bones that a subsequent petitions committee will end up revisiting this issue in the next session of Parliament.
That brings us to PE2132, which might be the final one, but it is in no sense less important. It deals with the dualling of the A96 between Inverness and Nairn. I invite Fergus Ewing to take forward the questions on the petition. He has sat very patiently through our consideration of all the other roads before getting to the one that he would say is most important.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Jackson Carlaw
We are running out of time, but there is one small supplementary question.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Within reason.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Jackson Carlaw
That is very exciting news from my point of view, although I have not been up that road in a while.
I will ask some general questions first. It is interesting to note that Scotland’s trunk road network is the single biggest asset that is owned by the Scottish Government. It is 2,179 miles long and is worth about £20 billion. It includes a 10-lane section of the M8 and rural carriageways through the west to the Highlands. It is an extraordinary thing.
There is no single document that sets out the Scottish Government’s programme of trunk road upgrades or the delivery milestones and associated budgets. Current plans, such as the second strategic transport projects review and the infrastructure investment plan, provide only a partial picture of the planned improvements. Is there a reason for not having all that in a single document, or is there an argument for having a single document that could pull all that together?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Jackson Carlaw
The process for authorising trunk road developments is long established—it is 40 years old. Some would argue that the pace of some recent approvals for projects has been slower than it might have been. Is there any plan to change the process—in particular, if a project has broad public and political support—in order to expedite things?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you, Mr Ewing. That peroration is probably a fresh petition in its own right, but I will allow the cabinet secretary an opportunity to respond.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Jackson Carlaw
We have covered a range of petitions, and it has been very helpful to the committee to take forward a number of them in the time that we have left. There might be some other petitions—there is still controversy ahead.
Would you like to add anything further, or do you feel that you have managed to convey everything that had to be said in the time that we have spent together?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you, Mr Marra. The committee understands that the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office has provided information to Dave Doogan MP on requests relating to deaths abroad. The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office’s figures reflect the number of requests that it has received for documents to assist with coroners’ inquests, rather than the number of inquests that have taken place, which accounts for the discrepancy in the numbers that the committee has received in response to our formal inquiry.
It is the case that, when considered in the abstract, such things may seem to be one thing, but individuals who then have to deal with the system find it to be wholly unsatisfactory in how they have to work and navigate their way through it.
11:15Bob Doris has joined us. Good morning, and welcome, Mr Doris. I am sorry that we began discussing the petition just ahead of your arrival, but would you like to say something to the committee on the petition?