Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 1 July 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3441 contributions

|

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 29 June 2022

Jackson Carlaw

Thank you. Do we have any other suggestions from colleagues?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 29 June 2022

Jackson Carlaw

Is that acceptable?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 29 June 2022

Jackson Carlaw

Fergus, are you nodding your head in agreement? Yes—I think you are. In that case, that is what we will do. We will keep the petition open.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 29 June 2022

Jackson Carlaw

Obviously, you were not involved in the discussion about the change of plea or anything like that.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 29 June 2022

Jackson Carlaw

That brings us to our final petition this morning, which is PE1938. It has been lodged by Carlie Power and calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to introduce mandatory microchipping of cats in Scotland and to assess the effectiveness of current microchip scanning processes. We are joined by the Parliament’s most famous cat owner, Christine Grahame MSP. Welcome.

The Scottish Government has indicated that it is working alongside the other UK Administrations on animal welfare issues, including consideration of the microchipping of cats. It advises that officials are following Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs proposals in the area and will give full consideration to the recent consultation results and any proposed legislation.

The petitioner welcomes the Scottish Government’s response and states that she is satisfied that the current approach will adequately address the issue of mandatory microchipping. She raises the issue of mandatory scanning and highlights that standards have been falling below best practice. The petitioner cites, as a potential reason for falling standards, a lack of understanding of and training in the use of scanning equipment, and she says that no official guidance on the issue is in place for councils.

The SPICe briefing that we have received highlights the UK Government’s consultation, which addressed scanning. Generally, it found broad support for improvements to the process but raised positive and negative impacts that might arise from compulsory microchipping. I think that it is quite likely that the Scottish Government will, having indicated that it is looking closely at the consultation in relation to microchipping and scanning, be inclined to follow whatever final course the UK Government chooses on this issue.

Christine Grahame, is there anything that you would like to say in relation to the petition?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Participatory and Deliberative Democracy

Meeting date: 15 June 2022

Jackson Carlaw

We return to where we began, to an extent, because Mr Stewart is keen to pursue some of the issues that relate to the recommendations and press a little further.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Participatory and Deliberative Democracy

Meeting date: 15 June 2022

Jackson Carlaw

We will do that at the appropriate time, to test the water. I will dabble my toes in the waters of that statement and will see what response I get, at the appropriate time.

I understand, having participated in the work of the parliamentary commission and in other events, that it is easy to set up a timeline. We set up timelines using parliamentary structures because we anticipate, in a sense, what we might be about to hear, and we therefore think that we can benchmark when the next milestone will be. However, in the evidence that you are hearing, you will hear fresh thoughts, challenges and ideas that might contradict views that people have held before. As you are reflecting, do you have in your mind an idea of when the Government will be able to indicate formally what its thoughts on the report are?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 15 June 2022

Jackson Carlaw

I thank the minister, Mr Kinnaird and Mr Rafferty for joining us this morning, and I thank Brian Whittle, too, for his participation.

Colleagues, are we content to consider the evidence that we have heard this morning at a future meeting of the committee?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 15 June 2022

Jackson Carlaw

Hold on a second, Mr Whittle—what has overtaken Whitelee? It used to be the biggest.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 15 June 2022

Jackson Carlaw

Thank you. I wonder whether we might also write to some of the bodies that represent victims and survivors, just to call in aid to the argument and to get some understanding of their views on widening the eligibility criteria. They must be aware of the particular circumstances of the groups that are falling through the net, and might be able to identify others that they would say are in a similar situation. Do we agree to write to those bodies, together with the suggestions that have already been made?

Members indicated agreement.