The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3461 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Jackson Carlaw
That brings us to our final petition this morning, which is PE1938. It has been lodged by Carlie Power and calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to introduce mandatory microchipping of cats in Scotland and to assess the effectiveness of current microchip scanning processes. We are joined by the Parliament’s most famous cat owner, Christine Grahame MSP. Welcome.
The Scottish Government has indicated that it is working alongside the other UK Administrations on animal welfare issues, including consideration of the microchipping of cats. It advises that officials are following Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs proposals in the area and will give full consideration to the recent consultation results and any proposed legislation.
The petitioner welcomes the Scottish Government’s response and states that she is satisfied that the current approach will adequately address the issue of mandatory microchipping. She raises the issue of mandatory scanning and highlights that standards have been falling below best practice. The petitioner cites, as a potential reason for falling standards, a lack of understanding of and training in the use of scanning equipment, and she says that no official guidance on the issue is in place for councils.
The SPICe briefing that we have received highlights the UK Government’s consultation, which addressed scanning. Generally, it found broad support for improvements to the process but raised positive and negative impacts that might arise from compulsory microchipping. I think that it is quite likely that the Scottish Government will, having indicated that it is looking closely at the consultation in relation to microchipping and scanning, be inclined to follow whatever final course the UK Government chooses on this issue.
Christine Grahame, is there anything that you would like to say in relation to the petition?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Did you have a sense that they wanted simply to dispense with the issue, rather than redress the concern or the—
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Jackson Carlaw
I have a final question, and then I will invite colleagues to speak. Has your experience and the petition that you have lodged led you to understand the experience of others as well?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Jackson Carlaw
The next continued petition is PE1860, lodged by Jennifer Morrison-Holdham. The petition calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to amend the Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973 to allow retrospective claims to be made.
We last considered this petition on 18 May 2022 and we agreed to write to the Scottish Government. Following our previous consideration, we have received a response from the Minister for Community Safety, which members will have noted in their papers. Do members have any comments or suggestions for action?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Jackson Carlaw
I am quite happy that we do that, because I agree with what you say about the issues that were raised; you are quite correct. We will incorporate that as well.
Are we content with those suggestions?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Jackson Carlaw
I am happy to incorporate that as well. Are members content with that proposed action?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Jackson Carlaw
We will close the petition and write, accordingly, to the petitioner with the suggestions that Mr Stewart has made.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Jackson Carlaw
I am grateful to you for that, Christine. We have taken note of one or two areas that we might pursue. I am wondering what the consequences would be for us all if we could relocate to a house or street where the food was better. It might provoke a few controversies. [Laughter.]
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Mr Carlaw does all the cooking, so there might be a disastrous outcome. [Laughter.]
I am grateful for what Christine Grahame has said. Are there any suggestions from colleagues in addition to the one that we have heard from Christine Grahame?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 29 June 2022
Jackson Carlaw
We will do that as well. Thank you very much.
That concludes the public part of our meeting. The next public meeting will take place on Wednesday 14 September 2022, with or without Mr Smokey as a guest. Thank you all.
10:32 Meeting continued in private until 10:35.