The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3461 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2022
Jackson Carlaw
They can do that. I would like to give the petitioner the most informed response possible. I think that that appears on our website in due course. Anybody could see from our website what advice we receive and how people could apply. That would be helpful.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2022
Jackson Carlaw
PE1919, which was lodged by Ted Gourley, is on prohibiting the sale of high-caffeine products to children for performance enhancement. The petition calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to ban the sale of fast release caffeine gum to under 18s for performance enhancement due to the risk of serious harm. We previously considered the petition on 23 February, when we agreed to write to the Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland, scottishathletics, sportscotland, Cardiac Risk in the Young, and Food Standards Scotland. I am pleased to say that we have received responses from those stakeholders as well as a submission from the petitioner.
Members will have noted that many of the responses refer to the Scottish Government’s consultation on the sale of energy drinks, and to the fact that Food Standards Scotland has committed to providing enhanced guidance on food additives, including caffeine, in the coming months.
The responses from sportscotland and scottishathletics highlight the potential challenges of implementing a ban that is specifically focused on performance enhancement. Cardiac Risk in the Young and the petitioner have also suggested that there is a need for further research to evaluate the impact of such products on young at-risk individuals and athletes.
Do members have any comments or suggestions on action? I think that the issue was raised in the chamber at some point. I recollect it coming up.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Good morning and welcome to the 13th meeting—I am sure that it will be lucky for us all—of the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee in 2022. We have apologies from Fergus Ewing and Paul Sweeney and are joined today by Carol Mochan, who is substituting for Paul Sweeney. Welcome to you, Carol.
Our first item of business, therefore—because this is the first time that you have been with us—is to invite you to declare any relevant interests.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2022
Jackson Carlaw
May I ask where that information came from?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2022
Jackson Carlaw
That is helpful. Do colleagues have comments, questions or suggestions?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Before I bring in David Torrance, I will say that, obviously, we can make further inquiries, but one suggestion is that we try to take the issue to the chamber for a debate in order to inform colleagues more broadly about the wider issues arising from this particular aspect of the use of mesh. We might want to consider that, but is there anything that we might want to do ahead of that?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2022
Jackson Carlaw
I do not know whether the petition needs to come back to us if we get that information. We could frame the response in the light of the further information that we receive.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Indeed. I would quite like to hear from the petitioner, too. I would like to adopt those suggested actions but also have a discussion with the petitioner when we have received those responses. He is an elected councillor, so it would be quite interesting to hear his view. I invite the clerk to consider whether it might be useful for us to speak to anyone else in the light of the responses that we receive.
I have had representations—I do not know whether they are hearsay, which is why I think that they are worth exploring—that, in some cases, a general decision has been taken just to go in and flatten a lot of headstones, whether they are at risk or not, as a pre-emptive measure and without reference. A lot of relatives have become quite distressed to find that such action has been taken.
It seems to me that, in the drafting of guidelines, there is currently something of an open environment whereby there is an opportunity to discuss the issues raised in the petition, to which we might make a useful contribution. I would be grateful if we could do that.
Are members content that we do so?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Are members content to do so?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Does anyone have any other thoughts? I wonder whether we might, in seeking advice, try to establish whether COSLA is aware of any widespread public concern about the issue. I am not clear about how widespread any concern might be.
I thank the petitioner. We will keep the petition open and will revert when we have that information.