The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3441 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Are we therefore content for some recommendations to be evolved on where we might visit and to plan to undertake that visit early in the new year?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2022
Jackson Carlaw
The clerks will take that forward for us. On that basis, we will keep the petition open.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you, Mr Torrance. If colleagues have nothing to add, are members content to keep the petition open and to write to the organisations that Mr Torrance has suggested?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2022
Jackson Carlaw
I am very happy to accommodate that suggestion. Are members of the committee content to keep the petition open and to write to the organisations suggested ahead of further consideration when we receive responses?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2022
Jackson Carlaw
PE1945, which is on banning the extraction and use of peat in horticulture and all growing media by 2023, was lodged by Elizabeth Otway. The petition calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to place a legal ban on the extraction of peat and peat imports, exports and sales in order to protect peatlands in Scotland and worldwide.
Elizabeth Otway states that the Scottish Government’s investment in peatland restoration is undermined by continued extraction and use of peat in horticulture. The call for a 2023 deadline is in line with the UK Climate Change Committee’s recommendation to ban peat extraction, sales and imports by 2023.
The Scottish Parliament information centre briefing notes that the Scottish Government’s commitment to phase out the use of horticultural peat has been made for several years. The UK Government aims to end the retail sale of peat and products containing peat in England and Wales by the end of the current UK Parliament, and by 2028 in the professional horticulture sector.
The Scottish Government’s response indicates that a public consultation will be launched shortly to inform its work in relation to banning the sale of peat-related gardening products, and it has commissioned research on the issue. The Scottish Government states that it is committed to setting a timescale for phasing out peat and to introducing legislation to support that.
In view of that suggestion to us from the Scottish Government, do members have any comments or further suggestions?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Mr McLean and Mr Fleming, do you want to respond to Mr Sweeney’s question and my codicil?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2022
Jackson Carlaw
We can. We might also want to write to Victim Support Scotland to ask for its views.
I apologise for my earlier mistake—the petitioner is Alex O’Kane. The clerks can liaise with Mr Sweeney in relation to the individual affected who would like to give evidence to the committee.
At this stage, are we prepared to keep the petition open and to explore how we take forward the suggestions that have been made?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Indeed. I would quite like to hear from the petitioner, too. I would like to adopt those suggested actions but also have a discussion with the petitioner when we have received those responses. He is an elected councillor, so it would be quite interesting to hear his view. I invite the clerk to consider whether it might be useful for us to speak to anyone else in the light of the responses that we receive.
I have had representations—I do not know whether they are hearsay, which is why I think that they are worth exploring—that, in some cases, a general decision has been taken just to go in and flatten a lot of headstones, whether they are at risk or not, as a pre-emptive measure and without reference. A lot of relatives have become quite distressed to find that such action has been taken.
It seems to me that, in the drafting of guidelines, there is currently something of an open environment whereby there is an opportunity to discuss the issues raised in the petition, to which we might make a useful contribution. I would be grateful if we could do that.
Are members content that we do so?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Are members content to do so?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Does anyone have any other thoughts? I wonder whether we might, in seeking advice, try to establish whether COSLA is aware of any widespread public concern about the issue. I am not clear about how widespread any concern might be.
I thank the petitioner. We will keep the petition open and will revert when we have that information.