Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 18 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3813 contributions

|

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 22 March 2023

Jackson Carlaw

I am interested in having a bit more understanding as well. The response from FSS says that a review is unlikely to happen in the foreseeable future, but what discussions are taking place about the process that might underpin a wider UK comprehensive review of food labelling? FSS refers to a review happening on a UK-wide basis, but I would like to understand whether the Scottish Government expects to proceed on that basis in this instance. What further information can it give us? We might ask it who in the UK Government is potentially leading on the matter. It may well be that, having received confirmation of that, we should write to the UK Government in due course to ask for its views on the process that would underpin a review. The proposed review is not as immediate a response as the petitioner is looking for, so I am very much in favour of Mr Stewart’s suggestions.

Are there any other thoughts from colleagues? As there are none, I propose that we keep the petition open and write to the various organisations, the Scottish Government and potentially the UK Government on the basis that we have described. We will maintain contact with the petitioners so that they have an opportunity to feed in their responses to any responses that we receive, and we will have that information before us when we next consider the petition. Are we agreed?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 22 March 2023

Jackson Carlaw

No, it is not.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 22 March 2023

Jackson Carlaw

Yes, we could ask the Government. I was wondering whether to write to every health board, but that would be quite cumbersome. We could maybe ask the Government whether there is any standard practice on this, identifying the fact that, among the young people who are petitioning us, there is a sense that it is an emerging and growing concern. It may well be that it is something that needs to happen because of a growing number of incidents.

Do we agree to the suggested action?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Decisions on Taking Business in Private

Meeting date: 22 March 2023

Jackson Carlaw

Good morning, and welcome to the fifth meeting in 2023 of the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee. Our first—I hope, very easy—decision is whether to take item 4 in private. Are we content to take that item in private?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 22 March 2023

Jackson Carlaw

That is a sympathetic and comprehensive response. Are colleagues agreed that we will write to the petitioner, confirming the information that we have received and the fact that NPF4 has been published, and that we will close the petition?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 8 March 2023

Jackson Carlaw

We will keep the petition open and write to the organisations accordingly.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 8 March 2023

Jackson Carlaw

Our final petition is PE1994, which is lodged by Margaret Fagan and calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to undertake a review of the trial process and the handling of witness evidence in sexual offence cases. Ms Fagan tells us that, while reforms aimed at protecting victims of sexual offences are welcome, changes to the law are, in her view, unduly disadvantaging those accused of committing such offences. She is particularly concerned that evidence gathered by the defence, such as medical reports and witness statements, is being rejected on the grounds that it is irrelevant or inadmissible.

In responding to the petition, the Scottish Government notes that reforms introduced through the Sexual Offences (Procedure and Evidence) (Scotland) Act 2002 amended the restrictions on evidence relating to sexual offences. The reforms were intended to prevent the leading of evidence that is of limited relevance to the particulars of the case or that unduly undermines the credibility of the complainer. The provisions were not intended to increase conviction rates, nor should they infringe on the accused’s right to a fair trial.

The Scottish Government response also notes that careful consideration has been given to the recommendations of the Lady Dorrian review, “Improving the Management of Sexual Offence Cases”, with a view to bringing forward proposals for legislative reform as part of the criminal justice reform bill. As noted in the SPICe briefing, it is anticipated that that bill will be introduced in the spring or summer of the current year.

Do members have any comments or suggestions for action?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 8 March 2023

Jackson Carlaw

Are we content to proceed on the basis of Mr Torrance’s recommendation? I believe that we are.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 8 March 2023

Jackson Carlaw

Colleagues might agree with your suggestion. I was minded to close the petition, given the difficulties with the school estate, but I take your point. It may well be that, given the strength of expression from the Children and Young People’s Commissioner, it would be useful to see the Scottish Government’s response to that. I still think, however, that it is unlikely that it will choose to err on the side of a national directive, but it is worth seeing that response. Are we content to make that further inquiry?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 8 March 2023

Jackson Carlaw

I am happy that we do so.

Members indicated agreement.