The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3441 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Your points have been noted. We will keep the petition open and proceed on that basis.
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jackson Carlaw
The next agenda item is consideration of new petitions. PE1954, which was lodged by Lorna Buntain, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to amend the current permitted development rights for digital communications infrastructure to encourage the use of underground ducting for new broadband service installations and avoid the installation of unsightly telegraph poles and overhead cables; ensure that local communities are made aware of plans to install digital communications infrastructure in their areas and are given an opportunity to share their views prior to any installation work taking place; and ensure that all digital infrastructure, including underground ducting, is routinely maintained by the developer.
Lorna tells us that, as part of the roll-out of ultrafast full fibre broadband, Openreach has erected hundreds of telegraph poles across Lennoxtown and Milton of Campsie. That work was carried out without prior consultation with the local community. Having received no prior notice, local residents raised objections with Openreach about the installation of the telegraph poles only to receive what they felt were unhelpful and dismissive responses.
As we do with all new petitions, the committee requested an initial view from the Scottish Government. In its response to that request, the Scottish Government has highlighted that, although
“land use planning is a devolved power”,
telecommunications remains “a reserved matter”. In response to the petition’s aim to amend permitted development rights, the Scottish Government notes that the permitted development right for digital communications infrastructure was included in phase 1 of its review of permitted development rights and was amended following a public consultation in August 2020. The Scottish Government believes that, having been recently reviewed and updated, the
“current provisions ... strike an appropriate balance”
and it has no plans to further amend permitted development rights in that area.
Do members have any comments or suggestions for action?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Are we generally agreed, then?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Are members content to proceed on that basis?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jackson Carlaw
The petition will stay open. We will write as suggested by Mr Stewart and consider the petition again in due course.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jackson Carlaw
I am grateful for that exposition. It seems like a commendable action that we could take in relation to the Scottish Government.
Is there also a way forward for us on Mr Sweeney’s suggestion? Would it involve our writing to the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities and finding out what enforcement takes place? I know from wearing a different hat in relation to showpeople that councils’ approaches to this matter can be highly individual and variable in the extreme. I do not know whether there would be a common response, but it might be interesting to find out how those matters are being approached and dealt with.
Does the committee agree to keep the petition open, move forward on those two streams and see what further information comes to us?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jackson Carlaw
I have resolved not to reach for any other metaphors. I take the point, and we can proceed on the basis that we have described with that understanding.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jackson Carlaw
In which case, I thank you both very much. Your evidence has been very helpful to our consideration of this distressing petition. Thank you for being present remotely and in person today.
I will suspend the meeting shortly, once members have agreed that we are content to consider the evidence at a subsequent meeting.
Members indicated agreement.
10:58 Meeting suspended.Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Are colleagues content to close the petition, as suggested by Alexander Stewart?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 23 November 2022
Jackson Carlaw
During your time on the task force, what were the key concerns that were raised regarding the experience of people who use drugs and their current interactions with the justice system?