Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 1 July 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3441 contributions

|

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 23 November 2022

Jackson Carlaw

Your points have been noted. We will keep the petition open and proceed on that basis.

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 23 November 2022

Jackson Carlaw

The next agenda item is consideration of new petitions. PE1954, which was lodged by Lorna Buntain, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to amend the current permitted development rights for digital communications infrastructure to encourage the use of underground ducting for new broadband service installations and avoid the installation of unsightly telegraph poles and overhead cables; ensure that local communities are made aware of plans to install digital communications infrastructure in their areas and are given an opportunity to share their views prior to any installation work taking place; and ensure that all digital infrastructure, including underground ducting, is routinely maintained by the developer.

Lorna tells us that, as part of the roll-out of ultrafast full fibre broadband, Openreach has erected hundreds of telegraph poles across Lennoxtown and Milton of Campsie. That work was carried out without prior consultation with the local community. Having received no prior notice, local residents raised objections with Openreach about the installation of the telegraph poles only to receive what they felt were unhelpful and dismissive responses.

As we do with all new petitions, the committee requested an initial view from the Scottish Government. In its response to that request, the Scottish Government has highlighted that, although

“land use planning is a devolved power”,

telecommunications remains “a reserved matter”. In response to the petition’s aim to amend permitted development rights, the Scottish Government notes that the permitted development right for digital communications infrastructure was included in phase 1 of its review of permitted development rights and was amended following a public consultation in August 2020. The Scottish Government believes that, having been recently reviewed and updated, the

“current provisions ... strike an appropriate balance”

and it has no plans to further amend permitted development rights in that area.

Do members have any comments or suggestions for action?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 23 November 2022

Jackson Carlaw

Are we generally agreed, then?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 23 November 2022

Jackson Carlaw

Are members content to proceed on that basis?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 23 November 2022

Jackson Carlaw

The petition will stay open. We will write as suggested by Mr Stewart and consider the petition again in due course.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 23 November 2022

Jackson Carlaw

I am grateful for that exposition. It seems like a commendable action that we could take in relation to the Scottish Government.

Is there also a way forward for us on Mr Sweeney’s suggestion? Would it involve our writing to the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities and finding out what enforcement takes place? I know from wearing a different hat in relation to showpeople that councils’ approaches to this matter can be highly individual and variable in the extreme. I do not know whether there would be a common response, but it might be interesting to find out how those matters are being approached and dealt with.

Does the committee agree to keep the petition open, move forward on those two streams and see what further information comes to us?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 23 November 2022

Jackson Carlaw

I have resolved not to reach for any other metaphors. I take the point, and we can proceed on the basis that we have described with that understanding.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 23 November 2022

Jackson Carlaw

In which case, I thank you both very much. Your evidence has been very helpful to our consideration of this distressing petition. Thank you for being present remotely and in person today.

I will suspend the meeting shortly, once members have agreed that we are content to consider the evidence at a subsequent meeting.

Members indicated agreement.

10:58 Meeting suspended.  

11:03 On resuming—  

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 23 November 2022

Jackson Carlaw

Are colleagues content to close the petition, as suggested by Alexander Stewart?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 23 November 2022

Jackson Carlaw

During your time on the task force, what were the key concerns that were raised regarding the experience of people who use drugs and their current interactions with the justice system?