The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3461 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Jackson Carlaw
I understand. Mr Ewing will go next.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Are colleagues content that we proceed on the basis of the suggestions made by Mr Stewart and Mr Ewing?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Given the response from the Scottish Government and its detailed explanation of its various initiatives, I think that there is little more that we, as a committee, could do. Are colleagues content to close the petition on that basis?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Jackson Carlaw
I wanted to pursue that issue myself. You started by saying that you thought that the incident in Elgin was isolated to the particular example that the petition raised. I was unclear why you thought that, but you explained that, although the information is not publicly transparent, it is there, and through the information that Police Scotland has available, you have been able to satisfy yourselves that it was just an isolated example. Therefore, when you said in response to the committee that the Scottish Government is giving consideration to that, it is not that you are considering a wholly new process, because you believe that the information is there already, but that you are considering how that information that is not necessarily or demonstrably available for people could be more transparent, so that people can see that the medicines have actually been prescribed. Is that correct?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Good morning, and welcome to the 17th meeting in 2022 of the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee. I am delighted that we have our deputy convener, David Torrance, back with us this morning. He has been absent for a few meetings.
We have a busy meeting this morning, including three evidence sessions on three important issues. Later, we will be joined by a golden eagle who is coming along, not to give evidence but to evidence one of the petitions that we will be discussing.
Agenda item 1 is for me to confirm with colleagues that we will take items 4, 5 and 6 in private. Do we agree to do so?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Jackson Carlaw
You paid tribute to the work of the petitioner earlier, and it was obviously a difficult personal situation that led to the petition being submitted to the committee. The petition identified some issues that were accepted in our correspondence with the Government as areas that merited a bit of further work and explanation.
We were impressed with the evidence that we heard last week. The experience of David Strang and Dr Carole Hunter is significant, and it underpinned an informed discussion.
Our job is in relation to the issues raised in the petition, and I will let David Torrance turn to those.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you. We are now happy to hear from Nicoletta Primo.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Jackson Carlaw
That might be something that the committee can pursue a bit further by trying to find out where those schemes exist, what the uptake is, and what education there has been for an understanding of the schemes among rail travellers and rail staff.
Mr Gallant mentioned that he lives in a rural community. Alexander Stewart is going to touch on rurality.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you.
Colleagues, we would normally consider the evidence at a future meeting, but one issue that has come out of the petition is that of companion travel. Are we content to initiate a series of inquiries of the local authorities that offer this scheme, in relation to its uptake and the understanding of passengers and rail staff of its working practices?
Issues have been identified, and it would be interesting to know whether the supporting local authorities are aware of passengers who are unable to access the ticket at the start of their journey and who then find that they are not entitled to the reduction at the end of the journey. It would be interesting to initiate some inquiries on those points, which would help to inform our next discussion.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 7 December 2022
Jackson Carlaw
I will bring in Fergus Ewing in a second but, for the purposes of our understanding, from an editorial point of view, how many people do you estimate are involved in the falconry business? Is the employment that underpins the practice of falconry quantifiable?