The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3280 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Our second item is consideration of continued petitions. The first of those is PE2006, which was lodged by Ewan Miller and calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to amend the Property Factors (Scotland) Act 2011 to cover dismissal of property factors or to lay other regulations that would achieve the same aim. That could include giving the First-tier Tribunal for Scotland housing and property chamber powers to resolve disputes related to the dismissal of property factors.
We last considered the petition on 13 November 2024. At that point, given all the different bits of evidence that we had received, we felt that, in order to understand matters better, including the position of the Scottish Government, we would invite the Minister for Victims and Community Safety to give evidence. I am absolutely delighted that the minister, Siobhian Brown, is with us this morning, together with a number of Government officials. Rather than my doing so, I wonder whether the minister would like to introduce the officials to us and tell us what they do.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Has the subsequent meeting that you mentioned taken place? Am I correct in picking up that it has?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Is there a proposal in all this?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jackson Carlaw
She is coming to the committee to address a tapestry of transport issues.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you, Mr Ewing. No doubt the cabinet secretary will take note of the Official Report when we flag up issues that might be raised with her when she gives evidence. I note that Nairn is a one-horse town with rabbit runs and that the traffic moves at the pace of a tortoise, but we will try to move beyond all those metaphors and analogies.
Are we content to include the petition as part of the forthcoming evidence session with the Cabinet Secretary for Transport on the various road transport petitions that we have before us?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jackson Carlaw
That concludes the public part of our meeting. We next meet on 5 March.
11:11 Meeting continued in private until 11:37.Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Petition PE2019, which was lodged by Alan McLeod, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to prevent all owners of self-catering holiday accommodation from obtaining rates relief under the small business bonus scheme.
We last considered the petition at our meeting on 1 May 2024, when we agreed to write to ask the Scottish Government for a fuller response to the petition, including a clear indication of its views on the action that the petition calls for.
In its response, the Scottish Government states that it is committed to maintaining the small business bonus scheme for 100,000 properties for the duration of the current parliamentary session, and that it has no plans to add “self-catering holiday accommodation” to the list of properties that are ineligible for small business bonus scheme relief at this time.
The Scottish Government also states that it is committed to keeping under review all recently implemented non-domestic rates reforms, such as changes to the thresholds for the small business bonus scheme relief, and to ensuring that the system effectively supports businesses and communities.
In his written submission, the petitioner shares his view that awarding market-distorting rates relief to businesses that secure economic advantage from state-provided infrastructure is unfair to citizens who are being denied critical care and services.
Do members have any comments or suggestions for action?
10:15Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you, Mr Ewing. Those are all helpful points to have on the record. However, as you said, the Scottish Government has made it absolutely clear that it has no intention of taking forward the issue in the petition. On that basis, it is proposed that we close the petition, albeit with a statement attached, which we can ensure that the petitioner receives. Are colleagues content that we do so?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Do any colleagues have further reflections?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Jackson Carlaw
I understand that, but the petitioner’s argument is that those who seek to dismiss property factors in the civil courts find that the whole process is not practical. Because of the intimidatory nature of potential legal costs and the unquantifiable nature of what they might be, it effectively flashes the frighteners, if I can put it that way, at residents who might feel that that is what they want to do so they hesitate before doing so. How do you respond to that inherent fear, which they say is a deterrent to acting on that instinct, even when they feel that it is what they have to do?