The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3461 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 March 2023
Jackson Carlaw
In that part of the meeting, we will consider the beginnings of our draft report. I hope that, if we cannot complete that work today, we will be content to arrange for it to be completed in private at later meetings. Do members agree to that?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 March 2023
Jackson Carlaw
We thank the petitioner for raising the issue with us, but we have taken it as far as we can. Do members agree to close the petition?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 March 2023
Jackson Carlaw
I absolutely agree.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Jackson Carlaw
We will defer closing the petition, Mr Stewart, if you are content, although I think that your analysis is largely correct. It would be interesting to put that question more directly back to the JCVI. Mr Ewing is correct: I do not think that, in all the representations that the JCVI has made, we have a specific explanation of why it is right in one place and wrong in another.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Colleagues might agree with your suggestion. I was minded to close the petition, given the difficulties with the school estate, but I take your point. It may well be that, given the strength of expression from the Children and Young People’s Commissioner, it would be useful to see the Scottish Government’s response to that. I still think, however, that it is unlikely that it will choose to err on the side of a national directive, but it is worth seeing that response. Are we content to make that further inquiry?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Jackson Carlaw
I am happy that we do so.
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Jackson Carlaw
I agree. In fact, although this might be for a later stage in our consideration, I recall having a conversation recently about supermarket chains. One or two supermarkets have actively decided to provide defibrillators on their premises, and one or two have actively decided not to. It will be interesting to hear from the British Heart Foundation and others what the potential barriers are to any of this. Perhaps, through the committee, we will be able to acknowledge the good work of all those who provide them. As you said, Carol, it is certainly an issue that has come up in members’ business debates and in questions in the Chamber, not least because people have had direct experience of a defibrillator making a meaningful difference and leading to a successful outcome for someone who has been subject to an attack.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Okay, are we agreed on that basis?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Jackson Carlaw
As always when we consider new petitions for the first time, it is important to say to anybody who might be tuning in because we are considering their petition that, prior to our consideration, we do a certain amount of background work in relation to the petition. Often, we seek the Scottish Government’s view, although any position that we might take thereafter is not conditional on that. I assure petitioners that we will have begun the process even before our first consideration in public.
The first of the new petitions is PE1983, lodged by Daniel Osula and calling on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to improve the transparency and accountability of the Scottish legal system by ensuring that clear information is provided to members of the public about how their case will be considered and that information is made available to members of the public about the processes for making a complaint about court staff.
In the petition’s background information, Mr Osula raises concerns about the transparency and accountability of court staff when cases are being prepared and allocated to judges. He notes that he has pursued complaints about the issue directly with the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service. In a response to the petition, the Scottish Government states that it considers both matters raised by the petition to be operational matters falling under the statutory responsibility of the Scottish Civil Justice Council and the Criminal Courts Rules Council. The Scottish Government also highlights that the operation of the courts is the responsibility of the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service under the leadership of its independent board, headed by the most senior judge in Scotland and the head of the Scottish judiciary, the Lord President.
Do members have any comments or suggestions for action?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 March 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Colleagues, are we content to keep the petition open and to write as recommended by Mr Torrance?
Members indicated agreement.