Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 5 July 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3461 contributions

|

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Decisions on Taking Business in Private

Meeting date: 22 March 2023

Jackson Carlaw

In that part of the meeting, we will consider the beginnings of our draft report. I hope that, if we cannot complete that work today, we will be content to arrange for it to be completed in private at later meetings. Do members agree to that?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 22 March 2023

Jackson Carlaw

We thank the petitioner for raising the issue with us, but we have taken it as far as we can. Do members agree to close the petition?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 22 March 2023

Jackson Carlaw

I absolutely agree.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 8 March 2023

Jackson Carlaw

We will defer closing the petition, Mr Stewart, if you are content, although I think that your analysis is largely correct. It would be interesting to put that question more directly back to the JCVI. Mr Ewing is correct: I do not think that, in all the representations that the JCVI has made, we have a specific explanation of why it is right in one place and wrong in another.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 8 March 2023

Jackson Carlaw

Colleagues might agree with your suggestion. I was minded to close the petition, given the difficulties with the school estate, but I take your point. It may well be that, given the strength of expression from the Children and Young People’s Commissioner, it would be useful to see the Scottish Government’s response to that. I still think, however, that it is unlikely that it will choose to err on the side of a national directive, but it is worth seeing that response. Are we content to make that further inquiry?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 8 March 2023

Jackson Carlaw

I am happy that we do so.

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 8 March 2023

Jackson Carlaw

I agree. In fact, although this might be for a later stage in our consideration, I recall having a conversation recently about supermarket chains. One or two supermarkets have actively decided to provide defibrillators on their premises, and one or two have actively decided not to. It will be interesting to hear from the British Heart Foundation and others what the potential barriers are to any of this. Perhaps, through the committee, we will be able to acknowledge the good work of all those who provide them. As you said, Carol, it is certainly an issue that has come up in members’ business debates and in questions in the Chamber, not least because people have had direct experience of a defibrillator making a meaningful difference and leading to a successful outcome for someone who has been subject to an attack.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 8 March 2023

Jackson Carlaw

Okay, are we agreed on that basis?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 8 March 2023

Jackson Carlaw

As always when we consider new petitions for the first time, it is important to say to anybody who might be tuning in because we are considering their petition that, prior to our consideration, we do a certain amount of background work in relation to the petition. Often, we seek the Scottish Government’s view, although any position that we might take thereafter is not conditional on that. I assure petitioners that we will have begun the process even before our first consideration in public.

The first of the new petitions is PE1983, lodged by Daniel Osula and calling on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to improve the transparency and accountability of the Scottish legal system by ensuring that clear information is provided to members of the public about how their case will be considered and that information is made available to members of the public about the processes for making a complaint about court staff.

In the petition’s background information, Mr Osula raises concerns about the transparency and accountability of court staff when cases are being prepared and allocated to judges. He notes that he has pursued complaints about the issue directly with the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service. In a response to the petition, the Scottish Government states that it considers both matters raised by the petition to be operational matters falling under the statutory responsibility of the Scottish Civil Justice Council and the Criminal Courts Rules Council. The Scottish Government also highlights that the operation of the courts is the responsibility of the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service under the leadership of its independent board, headed by the most senior judge in Scotland and the head of the Scottish judiciary, the Lord President.

Do members have any comments or suggestions for action?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 8 March 2023

Jackson Carlaw

Colleagues, are we content to keep the petition open and to write as recommended by Mr Torrance?

Members indicated agreement.