The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3461 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 19 April 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Laura Pasternak from Who Cares? Scotland, would you like to contribute anything at this opening point?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 19 April 2023
Jackson Carlaw
That is interesting.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 19 April 2023
Jackson Carlaw
I thank you both—we very much appreciate your contribution to the discussion this morning. I suspend the meeting briefly in order that we can invite others to join us.
10:14 Meeting suspended.
10:15 On resuming—
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 19 April 2023
Jackson Carlaw
I see that there are 13,255 children and young people who are looked after by local authorities. In 2020-21, 534 young people were recorded as entering continuing care, with 7,323 young people being eligible for aftercare. I want to be clear about this. In Jasmin’s experience, where advocacy was available and in place, she regarded the support package that she received as being superb.
There is obviously an appreciation of what the support should be. In Jasmin’s case, that happened. Is it that the resource is not there for everyone to experience the outcome that Jasmin did, or is it that there is, as you have both identified, a lack of understanding and availability of advocacy and a pathway to access the service? If that is the case, I would distil my question down to this: who needs to do what?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 19 April 2023
Jackson Carlaw
So who needs to do what? To whom would you like to say, “You need to change this, so that this happens.”?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 March 2023
Jackson Carlaw
I would certainly be interested in writing to the minister to ask him what form he expects his open line of communication to take and whether he is able to confirm a structured and ongoing basis for that. As Carol Mochan suggested, we also want to write more formally to the Scottish Social Services Council to seek its views on the issues raised in the petition. We want a view on providing bursaries to all third- and fourth-year undergraduate social work students on work placements; an explanation of the criteria for assessing bursary applications for postgraduate students; and clarification on where members of the public can access information on the assessment criteria, because SPICe seemed to find that more problematic than it ought to be. If SPICe found it problematic, I do not quite know how other people are meant to find it more readily.
Are we content to keep the petition open and proceed on that basis?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 March 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Yes, he wanted to capture it. [Laughter.]
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 March 2023
Jackson Carlaw
We will therefore keep the petition open. We will seek further information from those bodies, and we will invite the petitioners to join us at a future committee meeting in order to discuss directly with them their views on the responses that we receive and where we might take the petition. Do we agree to take that approach?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 March 2023
Jackson Carlaw
It would be interesting to inquire of Police Scotland the extent to which the condition of the roads has been a contributory factor in accidents that police have had to attend. Dipping back into my now long-distant past career in the retail motor industry, I recall that, as a large repairing operation, we did not routinely have to undertake repairs as a result of damage caused by potholes. To be fair, there were considerably fewer automobiles on the roads 30 years ago than there are today. Notwithstanding that, all of us can see a deterioration.
The word “pothole” can mean so many different things. It can mean just a little bit of rough texture on a road, which is messy, but it can also be quite a heavily disguised but large and fairly dangerous pothole, which, if the road is busy, people will often not have advance sight of until they find themselves in it. That needs to be taken far more seriously as it becomes a potentially more dangerous experience.
Are we agreed that we will write to the various organisations and keep the petition open?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 March 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Colleagues, are we content with Mr Stewart’s suggestion in relation to this petition?
Members indicated agreement.