The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3461 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Jackson Carlaw
For the record, I state that I am a member of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body, even though, in this instance, the recommendation is to send the petition to a different committee.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Is that advice being given only to motorcyclists or to tourists in general?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Jackson Carlaw
I wonder whether, when we write to the Scottish Government, we could, in addition, ask on what basis it is satisfied that the regulation is being properly implemented or how it would evidence that that is the case.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Do we agree with that suggestion? Having investigated that speculatively, I understand that it could be later in the autumn before the opportunity arises, which I suppose would allow us to pursue any outcomes that might be forthcoming from the on-going investigations, so that we have all that information before us at the time of the debate. Are we agreed?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Jackson Carlaw
I suggest that, just in case the current Deputy First Minister is not familiar with all the issues for whatever reason, we restate some of what we said in the letter to the previous Deputy First Minister and the response that we received at that time, to underpin why we now seek to meet the Deputy First Minister herself.
David, do you want to add to that?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Jackson Carlaw
PE1945, lodged by Elizabeth Otway, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to place a legal ban on the extraction of peat and on peat imports, exports and sales in order to protect peatlands in Scotland and worldwide.
The Scottish Government’s submission from last November highlights the fact that the revised draft national planning framework 4 prohibits new commercial peat extraction except in limited circumstances. Since that submission was received, NPF4 has been approved.
In its submission, the Scottish Government said that it had been working with the industry to understand “transitional issues” and that a consultation to remove peat from Scottish horticulture was expected to begin in December 2022 but that it would not be possible to implement a sales ban by 2023. The submission said that a
“delivery plan and timetable for phasing out horticultural peat”
would be developed after the consultation responses had been analysed and discussions with industry and environmental non-governmental organisations had taken place. The Scottish Government consultation was launched in February, in fact, and it closes shortly, on 12 May.
The Scottish Crofting Federation’s submission urges the Scottish Government to restrict any ban on peat to horticultural sales and imports and the commercial extraction of peat for burning, while protecting the traditional rights of crofters to extract peat on a small scale for personal use.
Do members have any questions or comments?
09:45Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Do other colleagues want to comment?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Do members agree to that?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Jackson Carlaw
As members have no more suggestions, are we content to proceed with writing to the Scottish Government as Mr Torrance has suggested?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 3 May 2023
Jackson Carlaw
The next item is consideration of new petitions. As I always do for the benefit of those who might be joining us online to watch our consideration of their petition, I indicate that, ahead of a petition’s first consideration, we seek an initial view from the Scottish Government and a briefing from the Scottish Parliament information centre, or SPICe, which is the Parliament’s impartial research service. That will not necessarily determine the committee’s view, but it does mean that, rather than our just going through the motions of suggesting that we get a briefing, we have anticipated that that will be our course of action and will, therefore, have the evidence already before us.
The first new petition is PE2003, which was lodged by Lewis McMartin. The petition calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to stop fast food chains promoting unhealthy food choices by banning the use of reward systems. The Scottish Government’s response outlines its current work to restrict the promotion of food and drink that is high in fat, sugar or salt. When consulting on its planned legislation on the issue, promotional reward systems were not specifically discussed, but it remained open to views on whether such other types of promotions should be restricted beyond those set out in the consultation. The Government is considering responses to the consultation and will publish an external analysis report.
Has the consultation concluded? I am told by the clerks that the consultation has now closed, so it is too late to suggest that the petitioner contributes to it. I am also told that the petitioner is aware of that fact. That is fine.
I felt that the term “fast food” was rather loose in its definition. There are fast food salad bars now. I was not sure whether the petitioner quite articulated who he was specifically targeting. Do we have any suggestions?