The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3461 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Does anybody else want to contribute on that point? Before anyone else comes in, there was also the issue about brains being routinely removed.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Jackson Carlaw
We could certainly refer to that in any submission that we make. After all, we do not want another broken promise.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Are we agreed? [Interruption.] Mr Ewing, are you agreeing, or do you want to comment?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Jackson Carlaw
That is fair enough. Thank you.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Do members agree with that approach?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Jackson Carlaw
I am content to invite Jackie Baillie to respond. I think that she indicated that she might like to make a further comment.
11:15Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Jackson Carlaw
I suspend the meeting briefly to allow for a changeover.
10:46 Meeting suspended.Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you, Ms Baillie. I think that that is reasonable. By 2033, even you and I might have retired along with other members of the committee.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Jackson Carlaw
I find that increasingly hard to do these days, but I still try.
David Torrance, do you have any suggestions that we might make? It seems perfectly reasonable to try to find out where we stand, as we were given to understand that we would have heard something by now.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Our next continued petition is PE1957, which calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to ensure that surveyors are legally responsible for the accuracy of information provided in the single survey and to increase the liability on surveyors to pay repair bills where a home report fails to highlight existing faults in the condition of the property.
We previously considered this petition at our meeting on 7 December 2022, when we agreed to seek the views of a number of organisations. We have received responses from the Scottish Law Commission, Built Environment Forum Scotland, the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors and the Law Society of Scotland. Copies of the responses have been included in our meeting papers for today.
Although BEFS saw no concern with the petitioner’s suggestion that all home reports should include contact details for the Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution, the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors response noted that
“it is not”
currently
“possible to name a single specific third-party resolution service as this would indicate bias”.
The responses from RICS and the Law Society noted an expectation that the Scottish Government will carry out a review of home reports in the near future, which is a move that BEFS would support.
Do members have any comments or suggestions?