The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3511 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Jackson Carlaw
On what is the safest thing for us to do, there is a proposal to close the petition or we can—[Laughter.] Are there any alternative suggestions?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Jackson Carlaw
We have a proposal to close the petition and one to ask the Scottish Government whether the camper van and motorhome working group has reported to the visitor management steering group and when the steering group is expected to respond to that report.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Jackson Carlaw
I understand. The thing is that it is not pathologists, it would be radiologists. It might very well be that the reason why pathologists are not interested in pursuing this is because it is not a service that they would be able to provide.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Do you expect to achieve the objective of 12 weeks in 80 per cent of cases, or do you think that that objective might be under challenge at present?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you. I suppose that we could also take evidence from camper van owners—that is potentially a way—[Laughter.]—forward.
Mr Torrance, save us from this mischievous hilarity.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you. That concludes agenda item 1.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Our next continued petition is PE1900, which was lodged by Kevin John Lawson. The petition calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to ensure that all detainees in police custody can access their prescribed medication, including methadone, in line with existing relevant operational procedures and guidance.
Empowering local authorities to ensure that local communities are given sufficient professional help—sorry, I am reading about the wrong petition.
We last considered the petition at our meeting on 18 January. It is a petition of some long standing, as colleagues will remember. Since that meeting, we have received two written submissions from the Minister for Drugs and Alcohol Policy. The first submission says that NHS Grampian—members will recall that it is involved in these matters—has £1,052,919 per year allocated from the £10 million available to fund work on medication-assisted treatment standards. It includes a letter from NHS Grampian stating that there has been a delay in obtaining the controlled drug licence application and that, although it is difficult to give a definitive timescale, the board is working towards an application being made by the end of April 2023. Presumably—I hope—that has now occurred.
A recent report has been brought to the attention of the committee in the minister’s second submission. The minister highlights that similar issues exist in NHS Lanarkshire as exist in NHS Grampian. In response, the minister has committed to conducting a rapid review of each health board to ascertain the extent of the issues across Scotland, which is positive. The work will include writing to the chief executive of each territorial health board and Police Scotland, details of which are included in the clerk’s note. The minister has stated that she will monitor the situation closely and provide updates to the committee as they become available.
That is a constructive response, following the engagement that we have had with the Scottish Government. Do members have any comments or suggestions?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you. I must say that I find the petition quite intriguing. I should say that I was at school with the son of the man who designed the road at the time. I do not think that that associates me with any personal blame for it, but I remember watching with quiet fascination it all being constructed in the early 1970s, when I was at school. Prior to its construction, it was quite a long journey. It was then quite a short journey, and then it became a very long journey again as traffic volumes increased and people became familiar with the road.
I noted with interest your most recent online campaign on the reconstruction of Charing Cross and the original buildings, which, I think, were demolished, and on the part of the road that runs along the front of the Mitchell library, which is potentially open to being capped. Is that correct?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Yes, I am content that we should do that. I wonder whether we might also ask the SQA the very same question. We would be interested to know the basis on which it has concluded that simply the academic review of the correctness of the marking is sufficient.
The exams diet is coming to a conclusion, and results will be forthcoming in the next few months, so the issue will become a very live one for a considerable number of people. It would be interesting for us to take the petition forward at least to that extent, in order to have greater clarity on why that will be the case. We might ask the SQA what practical implication it believes the approach will have in relation to the outcome of appeals this year in comparison with previous years.
Are we content to do that?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2023
Jackson Carlaw
I am sorry, Mr Choudhury, but what report is that?