The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4270 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Jackson Carlaw
Yes, it will allow that. Are colleagues agreed that we will defer a final decision on the petition, on the basis that we will add it to the list of petitions that we will consider leaving open for the next parliamentary session?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Jackson Carlaw
Do members agree to close the petition?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Jackson Carlaw
In the face of your eloquence and in view of the tragic circumstances that underpinned the petition—which might otherwise have been avoided, for all we know—that is a very focused additional inquiry, so I am minded, if the committee is willing, to hold the petition open by exception and to make that specific request of the Scottish Government. I do not think that we can go any wider, given that we want to see what action we can get. We have certainly been able to highlight the issue through the evidence of the petition’s having been raised and the contribution that you have made.
If colleagues are content, we will hold the petition open, by exception, and we will seek to clarify the specific point that Jackie Baillie has raised with the Scottish Government.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Jackson Carlaw
We will therefore hold the petition open and act on that basis. I thank Jackie Baillie for her contribution and the people in the gallery for being with us this morning.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you, Mr Golden. Are colleagues content to close the petition?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Jackson Carlaw
Mr Ewing, the long and winding road, as ever, leads us to your door. Thank you for your contribution on the petition. Are you making a formal proposal to close the petition and to establish in practice the criteria that we might indicate as the basis for its closure?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Jackson Carlaw
I have had constituency casework during the past couple of sessions of Parliament—other members might have had such casework, too—which had its genesis in issues that have arisen on power of attorney. I do not know how widespread this is, but local authorities have become progressively underresourced and certain areas simply have not been prioritised, because the focus has had to be elsewhere.
I am not presenting this issue as the only example in that regard, but I have found that there have been matters on which I might historically have expected the local authority to take a more active role. However, frankly, the resourcing to do so does not exist now, and certain things have been excused or passed over as a result.
There are issues to be considered, and were it not for the time left in this parliamentary session, and the fact that we have had a number of petitions relating to issues arising on power of attorney, this might have been a very interesting area for the committee to have explored in more detail.
I hope that the petition will return and that the issues in it can be pursued during the next parliamentary session but we have a recommendation to close it on the basis that has been suggested.
Are colleagues content with that?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Jackson Carlaw
The work of the Scottish Government’s inquiry is on-going. Therefore, it might be worthwhile for the petitioner to wait for that to conclude and then resubmit a new petition to the next Parliament, in the light of whatever arises from that. At that point, the new committee could consider it and potentially pursue it.
Are colleagues content, notwithstanding the importance of the issue, to support Mr Torrance’s recommendation?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you. I will make a couple of points before I bring in colleagues. Although I talked about the petitions being quite technically varied, community engagement is an underlying theme, which is sometimes prominent and sometimes discrete.
In relation to outages as a result of last week’s weather event, you said that, mercifully, we have been much more fortunate than we were a year ago. Was that in any way due to resilience planning in the interim, or were we just luckier this time than we were the previous time we had bad weather?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Jackson Carlaw
It would be very helpful to have any further detail on that review, including the timescales that are envisaged for it.