The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3461 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Jackson Carlaw
We are back. Our colleague Oliver Mundell has had to leave us due to another commitment. I apologise for that to our colleagues and to the witnesses who now join us. I hope that you were able to hear the earlier evidence session. I see that you were. It was very interesting.
From Transport Scotland, we are now joined by Alison Irvine, interim chief executive, and Rob Galbraith, head of project delivery,. We also welcome Roy Brannen, a former chief executive of Transport Scotland, and Michelle Quinn, who is both a former director of major projects and a former interim chief executive of Transport Scotland. A very warm welcome to you all.
You will have observed our previous discussion with Grahame Barn. I want to emphasise that our inquiry has two purposes. First, we have an interest in the events that led to the delays and why we are where we are today in respect of the project. However, secondly, the aim of the petitioner is, of course, the delivery of a completed A9 route and one or two other issues, including a memorial. Our focus is very much on ensuring that we deliver on that. This is not some sort of kangaroo court of inquiry into the events of the past. We are interested in those as they reflect on where we are today and how we can ensure that we complete the project.
If everyone is content, we will move straight to questions, starting with Fergus Ewing.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Jackson Carlaw
As we are on this area, I will ask a question before I come to Mr Choudhury.
The committee has received a lot of briefings, and my question partly refers to historical material that we have received. In 2021 and 2022, Transport Scotland’s cost estimates for completing the project ranged between £4.5 billion and £6.25 billion. In December, though, the cabinet secretary announced a total programme cost of £3.7 billion at 2023-24 prices. I am keen to try to understand how we have arrived at £3.7 billion, having had those two earlier cost estimates quite recently prior to that.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Who is going to commit to the timescale? Alison Irvine has indicated that she will respond.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Mr Galbraith, would you like to respond to that?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Jackson Carlaw
My apologies. We are crossing wires.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Jackson Carlaw
That was interesting. In that case, I will turn to Michelle Quinn.
Good morning. A number of projects were operating concurrently. Do you have a view as to where the A9 sat in that complexity?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you. I have a number of other questions, but I am keen to bring in colleagues. David Torrance has a question.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Jackson Carlaw
It sounds as though some of the initiation for that came from within Transport Scotland.
When you say that you “updated our ministers”, I assume that you do not mean that you got rid of the ones that you did not like and got new ones. I assume that you mean that you briefed them accordingly.
I note that, at that point, Mr Neil and Mr Brown—Keith Brown—who had to manage a number of projects simultaneously, stopped being involved and Michael Matheson came in. There is a suggestion that that is when a degree of drift and delay crept into the whole project, which affected its momentum. I know that other events unfolded two years later, when we had the pandemic and everything else, but it is not clear to me whether, from the point of view of ministerial direction and oversight, there was the same degree of focus on the project as there had been up until that point.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Jackson Carlaw
I am happy to include them in the list.
Are we content with those suggestions? If Mr Torrance can just nod his head, I will know that he is content, too.
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you, Mr Choudhury. There seemed to be a gap between warm words and operational practice in Police Scotland’s approach, so those questions need to be put to it directly.
It seems that no other member wishes to comment further. Is the committee content to keep the petition open and to progress the issues with Police Scotland directly, along the lines that Mr Choudhury suggested?
Members indicated agreement.