The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1709 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Claire Baker
That is welcome.
The contract starts on 31 January, so there is quite a lot to do before that date, given that you are implementing TUPE, mapping and all the rest of it.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Claire Baker
Thank you, convener. I am pleased to join the committee. I do not have anything relevant to declare.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Claire Baker
I am pleased that you have confirmed that TUPE is being used for the advocates who worked for the previous organisation. That organisation employed 48 advocates, I think, among its 58 staff members. Is that right? Is the intention that the 48 advocates will come over to you?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Claire Baker
It is good that you have the intention to keep the staffing complement that was there before.
Carol Mochan asked about the value of the contract being lower. Usually, the cost of a contract is in people. Employment is the heaviest cost. You suggested that the use of technology at other ends of the business would explain how you can do it on a reduced budget, so it is not to do with staff reduction.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Claire Baker
Professor Schaffer mentioned the election and the use of misleading videos. Business does not happen in a bubble. People who run businesses and SMEs do not isolate themselves in their businesses. Like everyone else, they use their phones, so they will see external influences. We have talked about bad-faith actors. Businesses need to think about how AI could be used negatively against them, perhaps through comments about their business. That happens more often these days. How can we increase people’s knowledge and understanding of that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Claire Baker
But, with the pace of change, it has become more difficult to tell whether something is true. Previously, we would see an animation and we would be able to tell that it was not real, but now that we can see an image of an actual person doing something, it is hard to believe that what our eyes are telling us is not true.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Claire Baker
Can I ask one other brief question that is linked? We are an ethical nation but a small country. Can we have an ethical approach to AI, given that a lot of the content is not generated in Scotland? How difficult is it for any country—and we are quite small—to say that it will be an ethical AI provider, producer or user when so much of the content comes from outside?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Claire Baker
Thank you for being here this morning.
I suppose that the average person’s understanding of their engagement with AI involves trying to work out whether the video on their phone is AI or not. Yesterday, on the radio there was a story about reducing animal testing and AI being part of the solution, but, this morning, there was another report on the radio about the music industry, the pressure that it is under from AI and the concerns that exist in that area.
The example of health has already been cited. It feels as though, in health, AI is a tool. I think that most people would understand it as a tool in the sense that we would usually recognise a tool—it is able to analyse and provide information more quickly and to be reliable in doing so. However, for most people, that is only part of the story of AI. Could you say a bit more about where you think that there are legitimate concerns, whether for sectors or for individuals? Is improving public understanding part of the solution, or is the public’s level of distrust or fear legitimate?
Professor Schaffer, would you like to respond? You mentioned the issue of students and how difficult it is to manage their use of AI in universities.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Claire Baker
Heather, in the work that you do, do you distinguish between the ways in which, broadly speaking—there are probably more than two of them—AI is used? When we think about the economy, are we just more focused on it as a tool? Next week, we will hear from a panel that will include musicians, who might have more to say about copyright issues and so on. Is your organisation more focused on how AI can be used by businesses as a tool, or do you also engage with broader issues around interpretation or the potential to mislead?
10:30Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Claire Baker
The Government is coming up with an AI strategy, although I think that it has been delayed until the spring. There is a subgroup of industry members. The process is very business focused. Do you think that that is the right approach, or should the Government look at the broader impact of AI on society?