The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1696 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee 6 March 2024
Meeting date: 6 March 2024
Claire Baker
I think that you said that you are responsible for 70 per cent of procurement. Just so that I understand how NHS procurement works, can you say whether the boards have individual procurement?
Economy and Fair Work Committee 6 March 2024
Meeting date: 6 March 2024
Claire Baker
Stephen Connor, what has been positive about the 2014 act and where might there be areas for improvement?
Economy and Fair Work Committee 6 March 2024
Meeting date: 6 March 2024
Claire Baker
I come to Rob Mustard and Joe Rowan. As I understand it, Scottish Water as a body is not identified in the 2014 act, but it follows what is in there, which would suggest that you are quite keen on the act. Do you want to talk about the positives of the act?
Economy and Fair Work Committee 6 March 2024
Meeting date: 6 March 2024
Claire Baker
I thank the witnesses for attending the meeting and for contributing to our inquiry.
12:01 Meeting continued in private until 12:20.Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Claire Baker
Good morning, and welcome to the seventh meeting in 2024 of the Economy and Fair Work Committee. Under our first agenda item, we must decide whether to take item 3 in private. Are members content to do so?
Members indicated agreement.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Claire Baker
The submission from the SCVO that we received said that the recent Scottish Government spending review highlighted procurement as an area where efficiencies could be achieved. Do you have concerns that that puts further pressure on the cost components of bids? We passed the budget yesterday, and we know about the pressures that there are on Scottish spending. However, do you have any concerns that procurement is being seen as an area in which we could gain efficiencies? That area was highlighted in the paper.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Claire Baker
The SCVO has provided in its written submission six suggestions for improvements, one of which involves necessary accreditations.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Claire Baker
That is great. Thank you very much for your evidence this morning. I suspend the meeting to allow for a changeover of witnesses.
10:46 Meeting suspended.Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Claire Baker
Do you have an example of a local authority that has successfully brought procurement and equality together? The committee heard about the community wealth-building pilots when we last looked at the issue.
11:00Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 February 2024
Claire Baker
There is also the £4 million threshold, which means that, with contracts of a value equal to or in excess of £4 million, authorities must consider including community benefit requirements. Martin, do you have any views on that? The committee has heard previously about the community wealth building pilots—I think that there is one in Clackmannanshire, and that five regional authorities are involved overall—but do you think that that threshold is still appropriate and effective in driving community benefit policies?