The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1870 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2026
Claire Baker
I just have a brief final question. Is that okay?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2026
Claire Baker
You mentioned Audit Scotland. I have questioned the increasing budget. Audit Scotland has raised the point that there is limited evidence that the necessary resources will be in place, so it is concerned about there being too little budget. It is a bit like the three bears—is it too much, is it too little or is it just right? What would you say in relation to the comments in Audit Scotland’s report?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 January 2026
Claire Baker
I have a quick follow-up question. The winter heating payment is automatic, and it is a qualifying payment that is assessed through other benefits. However, there is a page about promotion and take-up of the benefit. If it is an automatic benefit, why do we need promotion, take-up materials and a campaign?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 January 2026
Claire Baker
I will start with a question that I asked the Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Local Government during the budget statement.
John Dickie, you said that the £126 million has been taken out of social security, but the budget line shows that £152 million is being transferred into social security, because staff are being transferred into Social Security Scotland. We are spending a lot of time talking about what to do with the £126 million, which is not insignificant, but the social security budget line for the organisation is going up. Do you have an understanding of how it is justified that the budget line for the organisation is going up while money is being taken out that should, as you are arguing, be in there to increase the child payment?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 January 2026
Claire Baker
I turn to the Fraser of Allander Institute—although other witnesses can comment—because it has done some work on fairness around the child payment to do with the point at which the income that a family is receiving is comparable to somebody who is in employment. If my understanding is correct, part of the issue is that universal credit tapers but we cannot taper the Scottish child payment. The Fraser of Allander Institute’s submission states:
“There are also fairness considerations surrounding the possibility that a family earning more than an otherwise identical counterpart could end up with a lower total income.”
Do you want to expand on the issues around that, Dr Randolph?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 January 2026
Claire Baker
We should not forget that the parents of the majority of children in poverty who receive universal credit are in work—I think that that is correct.
Does anybody else want to comment before we move on?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 January 2026
Claire Baker
Do you think that people have sufficient understanding of that? Do they get enough support to think through what the impact would be? Often, it can be difficult for a family to reach the point at which it is receiving a suite or package of benefits. If a family is stable and secure, and if they feel that they are managing on their current income, it can be quite a leap to move beyond that. They would have to consider what they were going to lose or retain. Is there enough support for people to navigate that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 January 2026
Claire Baker
Is it something that we need to be mindful of? Although the LSE report said that concerns around incentives and disincentives were overplayed, some of the detail described families reducing their hours or resisting taking a pay increase because it would affect that benefit.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 January 2026
Claire Baker
Thank you.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 January 2026
Claire Baker
Professor Sinclair, I think that it may have been your own commission that did some analysis of the increase in the child payment to £40 for babies—those under one year old—and said that it would have a positive impact on those families but a negligible impact on our child poverty targets. That could just be because it is such a small group of people. Do you want to say anything further on that?