The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 787 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 12 May 2022
George Adam
Thank you, convener. If you will indulge me, I will make a brief statement on the bill. As members will recall, it is a limited, single-purpose bill. It seeks to ensure compliance with treaties that the United Kingdom Government has agreed in relation to candidacy rights in local government elections.
I welcome the Scottish Parliament’s unanimous support of the bill at stage 1 and the committee’s continuing scrutiny of it. As no amendments have been lodged for consideration at stage 2, I have nothing further to add.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 12 May 2022
George Adam
There is nothing to add to the letter, apart from to say that it was our intention to lodge an amendment but, in discussions with the UK Government, we found that it would create problems and difficulties on the UK side as opposed to ours and that the UK Government did not consider the matter to be a problem. Rather than have an argument with it about something that neither of us considered to be a serious problem, we decided that it would be best not to lodge an amendment. That is a simple summary of the position.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 3 March 2022
George Adam
I hope that I have picked up Bob Doris’s question correctly. If the UK Government extended the list of countries, we would, as I have mentioned, have the opportunity through a statutory instrument to change the list and include any new treaties that had been signed.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 3 March 2022
George Adam
Yes.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 3 March 2022
George Adam
I feel that I have already answered that question. To make you totally happy with the answer, Bob, I ask Iain Hockenhull to confirm what I said a minute ago.
09:45Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 3 March 2022
George Adam
Yes.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 3 March 2022
George Adam
My answers will be brief. Yes, and yes.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 3 March 2022
George Adam
Again, it is a question of balance. As we should remember with everything related to the bill, a limited number of people are involved. Iain Hockenhull can answer your question on the data.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 3 March 2022
George Adam
As I will probably say in many of my answers, that would be a problem and situation for the UK Government to deal with. There are always concerns that there might be a situation in which someone does not have the right to put themselves forward as a candidate, but the important thing to remember is that, if the UK Government changes the treaty, the bill will give us the ability to use a statutory instrument to ensure that we can follow suit. There might be a chance of some people having difficulty in being a candidate in the future, but it will be only a small percentage. If we look at the number of people who put their names forward for elected office as a percentage of the general population and then at the number of people whom the bill will affect, we see that it is a small minority. I am not saying that it would not happen, but it is unlikely. It would be an extreme case.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 3 March 2022
George Adam
I would be very surprised if, over the piece, we ended up with a record number of by-elections in local authorities and that that was causing financial problems for an authority. Should that ever happen, would we have a watching brief on that and possibly have a look at it? Yes, that would be the case. However, I find it difficult to think that we would end up with such a mass of by-elections.
It would be interesting to check how many by-elections there are, on average, over a given period. I will endeavour to look at that and get back to the committee with the detail. On the whole, I would be very surprised if that happened, but, if it did, I would keep an eye on it.