The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 898 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
George Adam
The definition is quite broad, however. Surely it needs to be tightened.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
George Adam
What you have all said makes more sense to me than what the bill says, which is that restriction is
“anything done by a member of the staff of an education provider with the intention of restricting the physical movement of a child or young person”.
That is all it says, but you are saying that restriction is stopping someone from doing something that they want to do. That might be a better explanation.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 September 2025
George Adam
Good morning. I will start with Alison Nolan first. As we all know, all roads lead to Paisley, and your submission mentions the increased uptake of services at the Paisley central library since it was put right in the middle of the high street, which is an example of culture being used as a regeneration tool for our high streets. More than 115,000 people visited the library in its first year on that site, and they would not otherwise have gone there, which shows that culture can be used to increase footfall in an area.
You talked about this to a certain degree earlier. Is it up to local authorities to have such ideas and commit to pushing them forward? In Paisley, we have the museum at the top end of the high street, the library right smack in the middle, and Paisley town hall—which is now a venue, after money was spent on converting it—at the bottom end. Basically, Renfrewshire Council is using culture as a regeneration tool to make sure that everybody else comes into town. It creates footfall, which gives people a reason to have a shop or whatever in Paisley town centre.
Is that an example of what you were talking about earlier? Perhaps you can give some more detail on how that approach could be used elsewhere, too.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 September 2025
George Adam
Of course, it would again be local authorities that would make the decision, so it would be about how they value—
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 September 2025
George Adam
It was in the submission. I was just following the evidence. [Laughter.]
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 September 2025
George Adam
My next question is on the visitor levy. Everyone has mentioned getting access to it—we have already spent any potential money from that about three times over today. If, hypothetically, a proportion of visitor levy could be used, how would your organisations invest it, what would you do with it, and what outcomes would fit with what the Scottish Government is looking for?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 September 2025
George Adam
I am 100 per cent behind you on that—the organisations create the footfall, so they should get that funding. However, would that not be skewed in some places? How would you do that in areas such as my own constituency of Paisley, or in other places across Scotland? Funding would almost be guaranteed in Edinburgh—boom; all the festivals would get a whole stack of funding. A positive argument could be made for that, but how would it work nationally?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 September 2025
George Adam
Does anyone else want to come in?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 September 2025
George Adam
Okay. You and previous witnesses have all said that cross-portfolio working would be a good idea. I totally buy into that, but the fact is that the Government is data driven. I asked a question about this area last week. If we were to be in a situation in which you believe that your organisations or what you do delivers in those key areas, what would be the quickest and most measurable outcomes that you could deliver—if we said that, from tomorrow, there was a possibility of getting people to work across portfolio?
Does anyone want to answer? Did that make any sense at all?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 September 2025
George Adam
My father-in-law is never away from the central library, as it is within walking distance for him.
Turning to the Scottish Artists Union, you were talking about a basic income pilot, Tamara. Could you give me some more detail on that? How would you perceive that working? I am always interested in new ways to look at things.