The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 699 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2024
George Adam
As Steven says, we will take that on board. We try to use these evidence sessions as a way for us to see how we can do things better.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2024
George Adam
With every LCM, the Government’s position is not available until it has made its position clear. Most of the time, if you are hearing nothing, that is why. I will use the example of the Automated Vehicles Bill, which was complex and detailed. It took quite a while for us to go through that in order to get the detail. If you made the assumption that we were happy with it, that was not the case; it was just a case of getting our ducks in a row so that we could make the arguments. There were certain knock-ons that the UK Government had assumed would not be a problem for the Scottish Government.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2024
George Adam
There have been a number of examples of LCMs recently where we were not happy with some parts—and we have made everybody aware of those parts—but were quite happy with other parts. I read everything that comes in with regard to LCMs but I cannot think of an example off the top of my head. Steven MacGregor, perhaps you could give some examples to back me up.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2024
George Adam
Mr Balfour, there is a hard way and an easy way to do business, and if I could find an easy way to do that and get it to you beforehand, I would. However, unfortunately, we do not live in that perfect world and it is not simple for us to achieve that. Wherever possible, we will try to get the information to you as quickly as we can, but—as we have heard today—it can be quite complex. Steven MacGregor might want to add something to that.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2024
George Adam
I do not think that there is a process tension; I think it is a political tension.
10:45Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2024
George Adam
There is a balance and a tension; I believe that it is a political tension. However, we have to be careful, because once something is included in a bill it becomes law. If we find at a later date that something does not work as well as we thought it would work, perhaps not because of drafting issues or something similar but because it is a clumsy piece of law, we do not have the flexibility to change that.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2024
George Adam
That is your opinion. My opinion is that it gives us the flexibility to be able to deliver to the public and engage with the public through the process.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2024
George Adam
Good morning, convener and committee members. It is good to see you all again. I note that Foysol Choudhury has joined the committee since my last visit. As a former member of the committee, I am only too well aware of the important work on legislation that all committee members do. I am pleased to be back with you to discuss matters within the committee’s remit.
From the Scottish Government’s perspective, the past six months have been broadly positive. We continue to strive to introduce the best-quality legislation that we can, and we have maintained high standards in the past quarter.
We continue to require to carefully consider the impact of the United Kingdom Government’s Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023 on the devolved statute book, but the volume of legislation arising continues to be manageable. We have introduced the long-awaited Judicial Factors (Scotland) Bill—which I know the convener is particularly keen to see progressed—and I welcome the steady progress that we continue to make in implementing recommendations from Scottish Law Commission reports.
I know that our respective officials continue to work closely together, and I remain committed to listening carefully to the views of the committee and doing my best to resolve any issues that arise. I look forward to hearing from committee members today, and I am happy to answer any of your questions.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2024
George Adam
How many did you say it was, convener?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 19 March 2024
George Adam
I am not seeing any major packages coming along in the not-too-distant future, but perhaps Steven MacGregor can give you some detail on that.