The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 827 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2025
George Adam
I will just ask this question, and then you can say what you like—as you have done.
You used the example of “Doctor Who” and said that Ncuti Gatwa is Scottish. To me, and to many people in Scotland, it feels like you are pointing at Scottish talent and saying, “Look, he’s in a major TV show—there you go.” However, “Doctor Who” is an example of a situation where the talent—the producer—when the BBC asked him to do the show, decided to go to Wales. He went to Wales, and now there is a generation full of talent, technicians and everything else based there, which is a good story.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2025
George Adam
We do not have the same here, but we keep being told that we have these Scottish productions. You can see our frustration.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2025
George Adam
I do. You are going to hear me say something really unusual: I agree with Stephen Kerr. Stephen and I have been known to have the odd barney—there is the odd bit of drama between us in the chamber. However, that is the only way that we, as back benchers, will get any BBC news coverage in any way, shape or form. Therefore, rather than the two of us having a sensible debate about something, we create a drama—which is probably better than many of the dramas that you broadcast.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2025
George Adam
But you can understand how it looks.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2025
George Adam
Further to Gillian Mackay’s questions on football, as a football fan—I am a St Mirren fan; some people would doubt whether that is actually football—I highlight the frustration of having to watch our national football team on YouTube. That is an embarrassment. I know that that is not the BBC’s fault; it is because of the international contracts and how the sports body negotiated them. Can you—do you—understand the frustration that is felt in Scotland about that? We are bombarded with other national teams’ games, whether those be on Channel 4 or on the BBC, yet we do not have access to coverage of our national team’s games.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2025
George Adam
It is difficult, because when we look at it, we see that there is no Scottish talent involved.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2025
George Adam
Ofcom will be giving evidence next week or in a few weeks.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 23 January 2025
George Adam
Mr Davie, if you were on “The Traitors” and you used that as an excuse or a defence, you would probably be banished that night.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
George Adam
I want to follow that up. In a professional setting, it would be down to both parties to sit down and have a conversation. You are telling us that your relationship with the SQA has broken down, that you have serious concerns about the situation and that all that you want is better communication between yourselves and the SQA. As Willie Rennie said, you are hardly being revolutionary; you just want better communication so that you can prevent some of the problems that Andy Johnston described. The SQA suddenly starting to talk about lawyers and solicitors just because you have put out a survey is hardly going to help to rebuild an open and transparent way of working.
Obviously, things will change when the Education (Scotland) Bill comes into force and there is a different organisation in place. Is that a point at which you might be able to try to rebuild the relationship and move forward? You do not seem to be asking for a lot—you just want involvement in the process and to ensure that you get the best for your pupils. I cannot see why the SQA has a problem with you. Am I looking at it the wrong way?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 22 January 2025
George Adam
On what Beinn Grant and Beau Johnston said about the education system, I feel your pain. I was educated in the 1970s and 1980s and I felt that it was like a prison. When I was 16, the teachers gladly opened the door as I walked out of the place. It was basically like that for pupils. It is interesting to hear that you think similarly and that young people think that way now.
What ideas do you have? We hear about that issue from stakeholders in education, but nobody seems to do anything about it. We always say that it is a landscape with many stakeholders and everybody has an opinion on it, so it becomes difficult to make any changes. What key changes would you guys make?