The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 711 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Murdo Fraser
Good morning.
I will pick up on what Colin Smyth said, which is a good starting point. I want to follow up on the convener’s thread. You will have followed the Finance and Public Administration Committee’s discussions on the matter. The core of our work is to understand the role of commissioners and the gap that they are attempting to fill.
With a population of 5.5 million, Scotland is a relatively small country. We have 129 MSPs and 57 MPs, and we have 28 ministers and law officers, so we are not exactly undergoverned at the present time. What gap are commissioners filling? Is their existence simply an admission that the other current structures are not working properly? Is not there a better way to address the issue?
Given that we are relatively short of time, I will ask my second question at the same time. You have all made specific proposals, and there are other proposals out there that I have heard about. For example, it has been proposed that there should be a commissioner for individuals with autism—for the neurodiverse community. There will be a long list of other interest groups that believe that they should have a commissioner, too. Where do we stop? How many commissioners should we end up with—or are you simply saying, “I want my commissioner, and that’ll be it”?
Jeremy Balfour is smiling, so I will go to him first.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Murdo Fraser
Yes.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Murdo Fraser
Would your proposals not fit under the remit of the Scottish Human Rights Commission? Jeremy, that commission told you that it does not have the resource, so instead of having separate commissioners for disabled people and for older people, could the Human Rights Commission be appropriately resourced to take on those roles?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Murdo Fraser
Thank you. That was very helpful. In fact, you have pre-empted my follow-up question, which was about potentially reviewing the funding model. You seem to be suggesting that, in contemplation, you are not enthusiastic about that.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Murdo Fraser
Good morning. I want to ask some questions on audit fees and costs, because that has come up in our evidence, including from the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman. The committee is dealing with SPCB supported bodies, which tend to have relatively small budgets, and the cost of audit is therefore a substantial burden on them. How does Audit Scotland determine the audit fees that are charged to those bodies? How do you ensure that those fees are fair and proportionate?
09:45SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Murdo Fraser
You and Jeremy Balfour have both made very compelling arguments for why there should be commissioners, but that leads me to my second question. Where do you draw the line? We could have commissioners for everything. Given that you could make a strong argument for commissioners in all sorts of areas, how do you set the criteria for when a commissioner is required?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Murdo Fraser
I specifically want to ask you about the criteria. How integral to your proposal, as you developed it, were the criteria that were set down by the Finance Committee in session 2?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Murdo Fraser
Thank you.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Murdo Fraser
I have a final question for all three of you, but I am conscious of time, so please give brief answers. When a member proposes a new commissioner, the non-Government bills unit advises the member to discuss the proposal with other commissioners or bodies operating in the landscape that the proposal impacts on. Did you consult other bodies as recommended? If so, what did you discuss and how did it influence your proposal?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 March 2025
Murdo Fraser
Thank you.