Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 3 July 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 825 contributions

|

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Ministerial Statement, Coronavirus Acts Reports and Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 24 February 2022

Murdo Fraser

I suspect that we may have to agree to disagree on that particular point.

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Ministerial Statement and Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 3 February 2022

Murdo Fraser

I will start by picking up on the convener’s last point, about a return to office working. It is fair to say that many employers will be moving to a hybrid model. What are the Scottish Government’s own plans in that regard?

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Ministerial Statement and Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 3 February 2022

Murdo Fraser

You would expect more than 5 per cent of staff to come to the office.

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Ministerial Statement and Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 3 February 2022

Murdo Fraser

I will ask Professor Leitch a separate question. We have heard a lot in the past week or so about the BA.2 subvariant of omicron. How worried should we be about it?

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Ministerial Statement and Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 3 February 2022

Murdo Fraser

Thank you. That is helpful. If somebody has had BA.1, can they then be infected with BA.2?

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Ministerial Statement and Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 3 February 2022

Murdo Fraser

Thanks. That is very helpful.

I have one more question for the cabinet secretary on a slightly different topic. We have heard from hospitality businesses that have still not received financial support. They were told in mid or early December that they would be restricted for the Christmas and Hogmanay period and they suffered significant financial losses. We are now at the beginning of February and they have not received payments. Will you give us an update as to when businesses can expect the payout?

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Ministerial Statement and Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 3 February 2022

Murdo Fraser

Earlier in the week, I spotted a press story that suggested that fewer than 5 per cent of the Government’s staff at Victoria Quay were turning up for work. Is that correct? Is that the level that you would expect? Would you not expect it to be higher?

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Ministerial Statement, Coronavirus Acts Report and Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 20 January 2022

Murdo Fraser

That is very helpful—thank you.

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Ministerial Statement, Coronavirus Acts Report and Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 20 January 2022

Murdo Fraser

Yes, I have a question that has come to me from a constituent; Jason Leitch might be best placed to respond to it. The situation is that the constituent was double vaccinated, and he then caught Covid. He has not yet had a booster. Under the vaccination certification scheme, he requires to get a booster. The point that he is making is that, having now had Covid, he would have natural immunity. Is it necessary for him to get a booster? What is the science behind that requirement?

I do not know whether Jason Leitch can help with that point.

COVID-19 Recovery Committee

Ministerial Statement, Coronavirus Acts Report and Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 20 January 2022

Murdo Fraser

I am sorry to pre-empt you, convener. I am content for the motions to be moved en bloc, but I want to make a point on SSI 2021/475. We have been advised that the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee considered that instrument on 11 January and disagreed to it on the grounds that the committee was dissatisfied with the use of the made affirmative procedure.

I think that we should simply note that. As it happens, the measures in the instrument are, of course, now historical and, on the basis of the announcements that were made earlier this week, will be removed next week. Therefore, I do not think that there is any point in us voting against the relevant motion, but we should note the concerns of the Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee.