The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 796 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Murdo Fraser
That was a very diplomatic answer.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Murdo Fraser
Yes. So, you are saying that it is more about the outside noise that could be generated.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Murdo Fraser
I will pick up on Ian Rogers’s point about funding. The committee is interested in examining funding for apprenticeships, to see whether the regime in Scotland is different from that elsewhere in the United Kingdom and whether we can learn from one another. Do any of you have experience of dealing with apprenticeships, or skills and training, elsewhere in the UK that would allow you to make comparisons? You might not, in which case we can move on quickly.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Murdo Fraser
Which institutions have you worked with?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Murdo Fraser
A lot of people have raised the issue of the apprenticeship levy, which is paid for by employers across the UK. You are all employers in Scotland. What do you think about the levy? Do you see that money coming back into your businesses?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Murdo Fraser
I have a slightly different question that goes back to something that Ian Rogers said earlier about the way in which we think of apprentices as opposed to those who have degrees. The committee is interested in hearing about graduate apprenticeships, where people work and study at the same time, coming out with a degree at the end while having worked all the way through. Do any of you have experience of, or views on, the value of graduate apprenticeships?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Murdo Fraser
With regard to the outcomes from that whole process, how confident are you that you are seeing meaningful change from your recommendations?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Murdo Fraser
I enjoyed your turn of phrase about rampaging across other people’s briefs. Perhaps, for completeness, I should ask either Julie Paterson or John Ireland the same question about overlap with other bodies and collaborative working. Have you got any experience of that? I appreciate that the Scottish Fiscal Commission is in a slightly different space.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Murdo Fraser
I have a couple of questions on how you exercise your functions, which I will be specific about.
I will start with Julie Paterson. The Mental Welfare Commission for Scotland has the authority to carry out investigations and make recommendations that it “considers appropriate”. Some SPCB-supported bodies have told us that they lack the powers to undertake investigative work under their own initiative. What is your process for identifying an issue for which you think an investigation is appropriate? What experience have you had, once you have submitted recommendations, of meaningful change resulting from them?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 1 May 2025
Murdo Fraser
As you will be aware, one of the reasons that this committee was established was to look not just at the role of existing supported bodies but at the case for any new ones, because a number of proposals to create new commissioners are in train. We are looking at that whole framework and argument. The Scottish Government’s draft ministerial control framework sets out that the creation of a new public body is a last resort. One of the factors that it considers is whether an existing organisation could cover the functions that are proposed for a new body.
Have any of you ever been asked to provide a view on a proposal to create a new body, perhaps in the same field as your organisation? If so, what was your experience of that and how did you feel about the process? Maybe the answer to that question is no, so it will be a very short answer. Do you have any experience of being asked to comment on a proposal for a new body?