The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 796 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Murdo Fraser
Good morning, minister. I want to ask you about how Grangemouth fits into the wider issue of energy security for the UK. Incidentally, I entirely agree with your comments on nuclear energy, which I think would be a useful part of the mix in Scotland.
We in the UK are now a net importer of oil and gas. Your Government has decided that it will not grant licences for new oil and gas exploration in the North Sea, as my colleague just mentioned. Can you explain the logic in our importing oil and gas at a higher carbon cost, when that means that we will be exporting the economic benefit and the jobs to other countries?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Murdo Fraser
Thanks for that answer.
Do you agree that there is no contradiction in trying to encourage a transition to renewable energy at the same time as taking the maximum advantage of the resources that we have? We will require oil and gas for decades to come, so we will just have to import more if we do not produce it at home.
Your Government is not granting consent to Rosebank and Jackdaw, which could make a major contribution to oil and gas and support jobs in the north-east economy. Harbour Energy in Aberdeen has just announced a cut of 250 jobs. Today, The Scotsman newspaper is reporting an open letter from 2,500 energy workers, business leaders and others in the north-east in which they call for an end to the windfall tax.
Do you not accept that your Government’s current approach is devastating the north-east economy, as those business leaders and others claim?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 May 2025
Murdo Fraser
What is your message, therefore, to the 2,500 people from the north-east of Scotland who have just signed the open letter that was reported in the media today? The letter states that you need to rethink your approach to the windfall tax and to the grant of new licences, because it is “devastating” for the north-east economy. Are you telling them that they just need to suck it up?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Murdo Fraser
When we spoke to the Scottish Biometrics Commissioner, he suggested increasing the frequency of his budget meetings with the SPCB and aligning them with the budget bid cycle. Do you have any views on that? How would that impact on capacity?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Murdo Fraser
That was interesting. We are all conscious that the Parliament unanimously agreed to a motion from the Finance and Public Administration Committee last year that there should be a moratorium on new SPCB-supported bodies, pending the work that that committee is doing. Notwithstanding that, members’ bills are progressing.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Murdo Fraser
Sorry—I missed that one.
We have taken evidence on the existing criteria for creating new SPCB-supported bodies. The Finance and Public Administration Committee recommends that the criteria be strengthened and formalised. Do you have any views on how that might be done? Who in the Parliament should be responsible for assessing new proposals against the criteria?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Murdo Fraser
Is that a helpful exchange?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Murdo Fraser
Good morning. The committee is interested in trying to understand the purpose of commissioners and the added value that they bring. Indeed, Mr Carlaw, you alluded to that in what you have just said. It is clear from the Finance and Public Administration Committee’s report and the evidence that we have taken that Scotland is not an undergoverned country; after all, we have 129 MSPs, 57 MPs and nearly 30 ministers and law officers.
Last week, I asked the Minister for Public Finance what would concern the Scottish Government the most—a critical report from a commissioner, a critical report from a cross-party parliamentary committee, or Opposition MSPs, or indeed MSPs from its own party, standing up and criticising it? I appreciate that the corporate body might not have a particular view on that question, but I am interested in knowing whether either of you has any personal reflections on the matter. If you were in government, would a commissioner’s recommendations be more impactful than those of a parliamentary committee?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Murdo Fraser
I am happy to get your personal view.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Murdo Fraser
Thank you.