Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 15 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 796 contributions

|

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Grangemouth’s Industrial Future

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Murdo Fraser

Good morning, minister. I want to ask you about how Grangemouth fits into the wider issue of energy security for the UK. Incidentally, I entirely agree with your comments on nuclear energy, which I think would be a useful part of the mix in Scotland.

We in the UK are now a net importer of oil and gas. Your Government has decided that it will not grant licences for new oil and gas exploration in the North Sea, as my colleague just mentioned. Can you explain the logic in our importing oil and gas at a higher carbon cost, when that means that we will be exporting the economic benefit and the jobs to other countries?

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Grangemouth’s Industrial Future

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Murdo Fraser

Thanks for that answer.

Do you agree that there is no contradiction in trying to encourage a transition to renewable energy at the same time as taking the maximum advantage of the resources that we have? We will require oil and gas for decades to come, so we will just have to import more if we do not produce it at home.

Your Government is not granting consent to Rosebank and Jackdaw, which could make a major contribution to oil and gas and support jobs in the north-east economy. Harbour Energy in Aberdeen has just announced a cut of 250 jobs. Today, The Scotsman newspaper is reporting an open letter from 2,500 energy workers, business leaders and others in the north-east in which they call for an end to the windfall tax.

Do you not accept that your Government’s current approach is devastating the north-east economy, as those business leaders and others claim?

Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]

Grangemouth’s Industrial Future

Meeting date: 21 May 2025

Murdo Fraser

What is your message, therefore, to the 2,500 people from the north-east of Scotland who have just signed the open letter that was reported in the media today? The letter states that you need to rethink your approach to the windfall tax and to the grant of new licences, because it is “devastating” for the north-east economy. Are you telling them that they just need to suck it up?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Murdo Fraser

When we spoke to the Scottish Biometrics Commissioner, he suggested increasing the frequency of his budget meetings with the SPCB and aligning them with the budget bid cycle. Do you have any views on that? How would that impact on capacity?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Murdo Fraser

That was interesting. We are all conscious that the Parliament unanimously agreed to a motion from the Finance and Public Administration Committee last year that there should be a moratorium on new SPCB-supported bodies, pending the work that that committee is doing. Notwithstanding that, members’ bills are progressing.

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Murdo Fraser

Sorry—I missed that one.

We have taken evidence on the existing criteria for creating new SPCB-supported bodies. The Finance and Public Administration Committee recommends that the criteria be strengthened and formalised. Do you have any views on how that might be done? Who in the Parliament should be responsible for assessing new proposals against the criteria?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Murdo Fraser

Is that a helpful exchange?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Murdo Fraser

Good morning. The committee is interested in trying to understand the purpose of commissioners and the added value that they bring. Indeed, Mr Carlaw, you alluded to that in what you have just said. It is clear from the Finance and Public Administration Committee’s report and the evidence that we have taken that Scotland is not an undergoverned country; after all, we have 129 MSPs, 57 MPs and nearly 30 ministers and law officers.

Last week, I asked the Minister for Public Finance what would concern the Scottish Government the most—a critical report from a commissioner, a critical report from a cross-party parliamentary committee, or Opposition MSPs, or indeed MSPs from its own party, standing up and criticising it? I appreciate that the corporate body might not have a particular view on that question, but I am interested in knowing whether either of you has any personal reflections on the matter. If you were in government, would a commissioner’s recommendations be more impactful than those of a parliamentary committee?

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Murdo Fraser

I am happy to get your personal view.

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]

SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review

Meeting date: 15 May 2025

Murdo Fraser

Thank you.