The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 894 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Michael Matheson
What do you mean by “managed as a whole”?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Michael Matheson
What if you were the third-largest landholder or owner in Scotland but each of the individual sites that you owned did not trigger the threshold for a land management plan? Should such a landholder or owner be responsible for bringing forward a land management plan?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Michael Matheson
I understand the point about transparency. However, what value does that have for the neighbouring community, which might agree with what is set out in the land management plan? They might think, “That has been really helpful. We’ve had a really good consultation exercise, and we agree with what has been set out.” The plan gets published, and people say that it is really good, but what happens if the land gets sold two years later and the new owner just rips the plan up? That is what I am trying to understand. You could go through a consultation exercise, engage with the community and produce a plan, and then you could quite literally just ignore it.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Michael Matheson
Good morning. The good news is that I will stick with land management plans; the bad news is that I want to go back to basics. I put the same question to each of the witnesses. What is your understanding of the purpose of a land management plan?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Michael Matheson
Yes.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Michael Matheson
Okay. Would you support amending the bill to ensure that that would happen in the case of aggregated corporate holdings?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Michael Matheson
Okay. Thanks.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Michael Matheson
I turn to what is proposed in the bill around the transfer test and the way in which the bill intends it to be applied to the seller prior to a sale being undertaken. Do you think that what the Government proposes in the bill is the right way to go about that? My question is for David Bean.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Michael Matheson
Gemma Cooper, would the inclusion of a public interest test in the bill help to address the concerns of your members? I suspect that it would not, but I will ask the question anyway.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 19 November 2024
Michael Matheson
Sarah-Jane Laing, on the difference in definitions, do you have a preferred one? I am working on the basis that the one in the bill is not the one that you prefer—unless it is.