Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 14 September 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 894 contributions

|

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Michael Matheson

Yes, but what is your opinion on how the processes have operated?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Michael Matheson

I am asking you specifically whether that is your experience of the process. I am not asking you for your opinion—I am asking whether, as a fact, that is your experience.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Michael Matheson

I am not really asking you about the due process that you presently follow as a regulator. The claim in the consultation is that the change is needed because the existing procedure

“results in delays, rarely results in a change of outcome, and is of limited utility”.

That is a direct quote from the consultation document and the findings of the review. Does that match your experience as the regulator, with responsibility for implementing the call-in procedure? I find it quite hard to believe that, as the regulator, you have no view on your experience of using the call-in procedure. It is quite a simple question; it is not a trick. To be very clear, I am asking you whether what is reflected in the document accurately reflects your experience.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Michael Matheson

How long will the consultation last for and when will the finalised document be published?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Michael Matheson

Thank you.

Turning to the changes in the rules on good husbandry and good estate management, I note that, in his contribution, Mr Oates referred to the issue of sustainability and regenerative practices and how they can be quite difficult to define. The bill changes the rules in that respect, with specific reference to “sustainable and regenerative agriculture”. Do you think that the right approach has been taken to changing those rules? Could the provision be further improved to give greater clarity?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 17 December 2024

Michael Matheson

That is helpful. I am not sure whether Martin Hall was referring to this in his comments, but the bill as drafted does not make provision in relation to charging for tenants’ improvements. Should the bill contain such a provision, given that it is in the original 1991 act?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 10 December 2024

Michael Matheson

On that suggestion, do you have any practical examples of times in the past 10 to 20 years when such a provision could have been useful and would have allowed land to be used for crofting? Can you think of any examples off the top of your head? If you cannot, feel free to get back to us later.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 10 December 2024

Michael Matheson

Is that a concern on the basis of how the crofting land will be used over that 99-year period, if somebody enters into an agreement of that nature?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 10 December 2024

Michael Matheson

Andrew Thin, I will briefly take you back to threshold sizes. I assure you that I will not push the commission to say what the threshold should be, given that you have been clear that you do not want to do that—and I understand that. I will try to summarise your position—correct me if I am wrong. I take it that you feel that the threshold should be based in regulations, as opposed to being in the bill, in order to provide flexibility. Should the threshold size then be set at Donna Smith’s preferred position of 500 hectares, for example, and we found unintended consequences as a result, that would allow us to move relatively quickly to address those. It would be more complex to do that if the threshold size was in the bill, as amending that would require primary legislation. Is that a fair summary of your position?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Environmental Governance

Meeting date: 10 December 2024

Michael Matheson

Notwithstanding whether you think that there is a gap in governance, it would be fair to say that the review identified issues with governance in environmental matters and with access to justice in itself. On the basis of what you have said about the changes to access to justice arrangements that are being made, alongside ESS’s powers, are you satisfied that the existing governance arrangements are adequate? The review suggests that there could be further engagement to look at areas in which improvements could be made. If there is a need for further engagement, are there areas that you think should be prioritised?