The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 894 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Michael Matheson
Yes, but what is your opinion on how the processes have operated?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Michael Matheson
I am asking you specifically whether that is your experience of the process. I am not asking you for your opinion—I am asking whether, as a fact, that is your experience.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Michael Matheson
I am not really asking you about the due process that you presently follow as a regulator. The claim in the consultation is that the change is needed because the existing procedure
“results in delays, rarely results in a change of outcome, and is of limited utility”.
That is a direct quote from the consultation document and the findings of the review. Does that match your experience as the regulator, with responsibility for implementing the call-in procedure? I find it quite hard to believe that, as the regulator, you have no view on your experience of using the call-in procedure. It is quite a simple question; it is not a trick. To be very clear, I am asking you whether what is reflected in the document accurately reflects your experience.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Michael Matheson
How long will the consultation last for and when will the finalised document be published?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Michael Matheson
Thank you.
Turning to the changes in the rules on good husbandry and good estate management, I note that, in his contribution, Mr Oates referred to the issue of sustainability and regenerative practices and how they can be quite difficult to define. The bill changes the rules in that respect, with specific reference to “sustainable and regenerative agriculture”. Do you think that the right approach has been taken to changing those rules? Could the provision be further improved to give greater clarity?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 17 December 2024
Michael Matheson
That is helpful. I am not sure whether Martin Hall was referring to this in his comments, but the bill as drafted does not make provision in relation to charging for tenants’ improvements. Should the bill contain such a provision, given that it is in the original 1991 act?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Michael Matheson
On that suggestion, do you have any practical examples of times in the past 10 to 20 years when such a provision could have been useful and would have allowed land to be used for crofting? Can you think of any examples off the top of your head? If you cannot, feel free to get back to us later.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Michael Matheson
Is that a concern on the basis of how the crofting land will be used over that 99-year period, if somebody enters into an agreement of that nature?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Michael Matheson
Andrew Thin, I will briefly take you back to threshold sizes. I assure you that I will not push the commission to say what the threshold should be, given that you have been clear that you do not want to do that—and I understand that. I will try to summarise your position—correct me if I am wrong. I take it that you feel that the threshold should be based in regulations, as opposed to being in the bill, in order to provide flexibility. Should the threshold size then be set at Donna Smith’s preferred position of 500 hectares, for example, and we found unintended consequences as a result, that would allow us to move relatively quickly to address those. It would be more complex to do that if the threshold size was in the bill, as amending that would require primary legislation. Is that a fair summary of your position?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Michael Matheson
Notwithstanding whether you think that there is a gap in governance, it would be fair to say that the review identified issues with governance in environmental matters and with access to justice in itself. On the basis of what you have said about the changes to access to justice arrangements that are being made, alongside ESS’s powers, are you satisfied that the existing governance arrangements are adequate? The review suggests that there could be further engagement to look at areas in which improvements could be made. If there is a need for further engagement, are there areas that you think should be prioritised?