The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1199 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Michael Matheson
Given the underpinning of the MOU in statute, I presume that there will also be an opportunity for parliamentary scrutiny at some point once it has been finalised.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Michael Matheson
Let us turn to your enforcement role. Given your experience to date, it would be helpful to get a sense of how you are finding the approach that you are taking to enforcement. I understand that you have an informal resolution process in the first instance. Could you explain how that is working and provide any examples of how you feel it has or has not worked? That would help the committee to get a sense of the progress that you are making.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Michael Matheson
:That is helpful. I will ask Emily Nurse a specific question on the issue of buildings. You mentioned that the figure that is being used in the CCP has been modelled to bank a reduction in energy use due to high gas prices and warmer winters. Are you effectively saying that the model and the approach that has been taken in calculating the figures for buildings emissions are unsustainable?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Michael Matheson
:Thanks.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Michael Matheson
:Sorry—the question is for Emily.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Michael Matheson
:Thanks. There are challenges for the Scottish Government to bring together credible contingency plans, given the level of uncertainty that it may have over reserved policy areas—which, I think, by your calculation, make up just over 40 per cent of what has to be achieved in the CCP. Will you remind me, what recommendations did you make to the UK Government in your advice on the actions that it should take in order to make sure that it sufficiently supports the other nations of the UK?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Michael Matheson
Good morning. I will pick up on some of the risks that you have identified in your report for the CCP. You have identified significant risk in a couple of areas, particularly in relation to buildings, which we have touched on, and agriculture. You flagged up a concern about the areas where overperformance is expected and the fact that there is insufficient contingency in relation to the areas that carry significant risk. You suggest two approaches: a change to the modelling; and the development of contingency plans for the areas of greatest risk. Of the options that you set out, which is your preferred approach?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 March 2026
Michael Matheson
:That is very helpful. To stick with contingency planning, you have recommended that the Scottish Government carry that out for areas in which it lacks agency or in which policy is reserved. The emissions trading scheme, CCS, the electric vehicle mandate and so on, as well as energy prices, are areas that the Scottish Government does not have control over.
Is it realistic for the Scottish Government to be expected to draw together contingency plans for areas that are reserved, given that it cannot identify or understand the pace and nature of how policy will be progressed by the UK Government in those areas?
10:15
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Michael Matheson
So, an independent person would review the matter.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 February 2026
Michael Matheson
There are only so many mitigation measures that can be put in place, so there will be only so much mitigation that can be done. Given the Scottish Government’s ambition to reach 40GW of offshore wind by 2040, where we are in the delivery pipeline in Scottish waters, as well as there obviously being a pipeline in England and Wales, what will be the process to ensure that it is not simply a case of first come, first served? If you drop all the scope mitigations that could be put in place outwith your own project, that could result in projects further down the line finding that there is not much left for them to do. It will not be quite like that—I am putting it in a fairly crude way—but I am trying to think about how we can ensure that we are giving as much scope as possible to maximise the process in a way that keeps in mind that it will be way into the 2030s before some projects are delivered and that there is a need to ensure that there are still some mitigation measures that they can help to support, when it comes to the point at which they need to do that.