The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 951 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Michael Matheson
That would be helpful. Thanks.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Michael Matheson
Given that Mr Reeve is here today, I want to turn to rail and the performance of ScotRail and Network Rail. I was struck by the recent figures that show that ScotRail had the lowest train cancellation rates in the UK in 2024-25, with an average of only 2 per cent of stops being cancelled compared with the UK average of 3.3 per cent. Do we know why ScotRail’s performance has improved in that area and why its cancellations are the lowest in the UK?
10:30Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Michael Matheson
I will follow up on the issue around Ardrossan harbour and Peel Ports’s behaviour. It is clearly seeking to get as much taxpayer money as it can for an asset that it has invested nothing in for the past couple of decades, beyond the odd essential bit of work.
Can the cabinet secretary inform the committee whether Peel Ports provided CMAL with full access to the data bank for the port, in order to ensure that any sale of the asset is a clean sale, with no small bits of ransom strip being held by Peel Ports for it to return to in order to try to get more taxpayer money out of us at a later date?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Michael Matheson
Is Peel Ports committed to a full, clean sale of the asset?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Michael Matheson
I would find it hard to believe that Peel Ports would not want to facilitate a clean sale, but we will leave it there.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Michael Matheson
You made a point about Great British railways. Is there any concern that that might reduce the level of responsibility, or the role, of Scottish ministers in the operation of the rail network in Scotland?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Michael Matheson
That was helpful. I understand and appreciate some of the challenges. I think that ScotRail expects to achieve PPM by 2027-28, as part of its five-year improvement programme; I wish it well with that.
I will ask about the decarbonisation of our railways. You recently announced the partial electrification of the Borders railway line and the Levenmouth line, with the intention of using battery electric trains. Can you give us a bit more detail about what your plans are for those lines?
Decarbonising our railways will clearly not be achieved through full electrification, in my view. Other options will have to be pursued to decarbonise some of our lines, particularly those that go up to Inverness and some other parts of rural Scotland, where electrification would end up creating resilience challenges, particularly during adverse weather in the winter months. What other options are we considering to decarbonise our railways if we cannot achieve that through electrification?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Michael Matheson
I do not think that we can wait for hydrogen; we have to press on with decarbonisation using other options, beyond electrification, that can help to decarbonise our railways. I suspect that hydrogen trains are quite a long distance away. I also think that, on some of the high-speed routes, hydrogen would not be effective, because we would burn through so much that lines could not be operational. What other options are we looking at?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Michael Matheson
That is helpful. It will be useful for the committee to be kept up to date on where progress has been made and on the potential risks and issues that might arise, given that it is a live issue.
Let us turn to the question of where we are with the public performance measure. The annualised target is 92.5 per cent, which it has been for quite an extended period of time. As yet, ScotRail has not been able to achieve that percentage. From what I can see, the annualised figure is sitting at just under 90 per cent—although the periodic figure is slightly better for the past four weeks. We have not seen a significant improvement on the PPM. We are broadly in line with where it was in 2008, 2009 and 2010, and that was still below the target. What are the principal inhibitors to our achieving the annualised 92.5 per cent PPM figure?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Michael Matheson
There is nothing else to finish on my line of questioning, but I want to pick up on the issue of pricing and the 3 to 12 percentage point increase that was mentioned. I presume that all of that cost does not have to go into the ticket. The airline could try to push some of it across its wider cost base, whether that involves its maintenance companies, service companies, terms and conditions of staff or airport operations. That is how some of the low-cost carriers operate. I presume that the cost could be dispersed in other ways, rather than being put straight on to tickets. Is that a fair assessment?
10:30