The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 951 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Michael Matheson
That is helpful.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Michael Matheson
Doug McKiernan, can you tell us, from your expertise and knowledge, what percentage of the SAF that is used by the aviation industry will come from the power-to-liquids sector by, say, 2040?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Michael Matheson
I want to pick up on what type of SAF you think will be able to meet the aviation sector’s demands. Doug McKiernan, from your earlier comments, I got the impression that you feel that the only one of the three generations of SAF that is likely to meet the aviation industry’s demands is power to liquids. Is that the case? I am also interested in hearing Ralph Lavery’s views on that. Is that the only scalable option that can meet the demands of the aviation industry in the next 10, 20 or 30 years?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Michael Matheson
Thanks. Ralph Lavery?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Michael Matheson
I was actually asking Ralph first.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Michael Matheson
I will come to you next, Ralph. Simon, did you want to comment?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Michael Matheson
Ralph?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Michael Matheson
It was that.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Michael Matheson
Good morning. I want to ask about the A9, although my question applies to any of the Government’s major transport infrastructure projects. We all recognise that good and effective transport infrastructure is critical to our economy. However, I am interested in how we use major infrastructure projects such as the A9 works to drive wider economic growth. My question is not so much about what the infrastructure itself provides; it is about how, if we are investing—around £3.7 billion in April 2023 prices to dual the A9, for example—we can ensure, through the procurement process and the way in which the funds are disbursed, that as much of the investment as possible goes into supporting economic growth, whether that is in the Highland region or across Scotland as a whole. How do we go about doing that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 October 2025
Michael Matheson
How does Transport Scotland specify that in its procurement process? How does it ensure that local businesses are able to maximise the potential benefit that comes from the huge investment in transport infrastructure? Are we in a position to demonstrate that? I am familiar with some of this, but is there a way in which Transport Scotland can document and demonstrate the benefit that is coming from, for example, dualling the Tomatin to Moy section? I think that Balfour Beatty has the contract for that project. Can Transport Scotland demonstrate how much Balfour Beatty, through the procurement process, is maximising the benefit to the local supply chain?