Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 4 February 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1089 contributions

|

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Transport Policies and Performance

Meeting date: 7 October 2025

Michael Matheson

How does Transport Scotland specify that in its procurement process? How does it ensure that local businesses are able to maximise the potential benefit that comes from the huge investment in transport infrastructure? Are we in a position to demonstrate that? I am familiar with some of this, but is there a way in which Transport Scotland can document and demonstrate the benefit that is coming from, for example, dualling the Tomatin to Moy section? I think that Balfour Beatty has the contract for that project. Can Transport Scotland demonstrate how much Balfour Beatty, through the procurement process, is maximising the benefit to the local supply chain?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Transport Policies and Performance

Meeting date: 7 October 2025

Michael Matheson

That would be helpful. Thanks.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Transport Policies and Performance

Meeting date: 7 October 2025

Michael Matheson

Given that Mr Reeve is here today, I want to turn to rail and the performance of ScotRail and Network Rail. I was struck by the recent figures that show that ScotRail had the lowest train cancellation rates in the UK in 2024-25, with an average of only 2 per cent of stops being cancelled compared with the UK average of 3.3 per cent. Do we know why ScotRail’s performance has improved in that area and why its cancellations are the lowest in the UK?

10:30  

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Transport Policies and Performance

Meeting date: 7 October 2025

Michael Matheson

I will follow up on the issue around Ardrossan harbour and Peel Ports’s behaviour. It is clearly seeking to get as much taxpayer money as it can for an asset that it has invested nothing in for the past couple of decades, beyond the odd essential bit of work.

Can the cabinet secretary inform the committee whether Peel Ports provided CMAL with full access to the data bank for the port, in order to ensure that any sale of the asset is a clean sale, with no small bits of ransom strip being held by Peel Ports for it to return to in order to try to get more taxpayer money out of us at a later date?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Transport Policies and Performance

Meeting date: 7 October 2025

Michael Matheson

Is Peel Ports committed to a full, clean sale of the asset?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Transport Policies and Performance

Meeting date: 7 October 2025

Michael Matheson

It was that.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Transport Policies and Performance

Meeting date: 7 October 2025

Michael Matheson

That is helpful. It will be useful for the committee to be kept up to date on where progress has been made and on the potential risks and issues that might arise, given that it is a live issue.

Let us turn to the question of where we are with the public performance measure. The annualised target is 92.5 per cent, which it has been for quite an extended period of time. As yet, ScotRail has not been able to achieve that percentage. From what I can see, the annualised figure is sitting at just under 90 per cent—although the periodic figure is slightly better for the past four weeks. We have not seen a significant improvement on the PPM. We are broadly in line with where it was in 2008, 2009 and 2010, and that was still below the target. What are the principal inhibitors to our achieving the annualised 92.5 per cent PPM figure?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill

Meeting date: 30 September 2025

Michael Matheson

Good morning. I want to turn to the potential for the production of SAF in Scotland. You will be aware of project willow, which identified two potential projects for SAF production in Grangemouth—project 6 and project 8. One was for HEFA and the other was for e-methanol and methanol to jet. Do you have a view on whether the proposals that are set out in project willow are realistic and deliverable within the timeframes that have been set?

In case you are not familiar with the timeframes, the timeframe for the HEFA project was 2032 and that for project 8, which is e-methanol and methanol to jet, was 2035. I was struck by Professor Maroto-Valer’s comment that the infrastructure at Grangemouth would allow us to do things more quickly, but those timeframes do not seem to be very short. What are your thoughts on that?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill

Meeting date: 30 September 2025

Michael Matheson

The timeline for HEFA is 2032 and the timeline for e-methanol and methanol to jet is 2035. Do you think that both of those timelines are ambitious?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Sustainable Aviation Fuel Bill

Meeting date: 30 September 2025

Michael Matheson

I turn to the issue of the role that low-carbon hydrogen might play in supporting development of the SAF sector.

Graham Hutchings made specific reference to the issue of green and blue hydrogen and the way in which they are being used at the moment. Graham, can I get a bit more detail from you? How important will the low-carbon hydrogen sector be to the development of the SAF sector? [Interruption.]

Hold on—I cannot hear you.