The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2921 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
I actually want to address my question to Gordon Martin and Kevin Lindsay. It is about the changes in station staffing and whether they have implications for managing antisocial behaviour. In particular, I was thinking about situations where a lone worker is managing a station with reduced hours and reduced staffing and how that works in antisocial behaviour hotspots at particular stations. A bit of an insight on that from the rail industry would be useful.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
As a follow-up to that—I will come to other witnesses afterwards—I have a question about the cliff edge in fares. I know quite a few people who have turned 22 and who suddenly have to pay the full fare. Have the young people in your group reflected on that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
That was a great example. My son used that bus service a lot last summer. However, that bus service was commissioned by the national park, so although a public agency commissioned it, it was run by a private company. Is there a role for councils and transport authorities to listen to users and to commission services, or should it be left to the market to decide? That service had not run for many years, and it took the national park stepping in to make it run again.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
What do you think the best structure is for running bus services? Is it community and municipal ownership or private ownership?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
Jackson Cullinane, do you want to add to that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
Kevin, you mentioned decommissioning of the HSTs and you talked earlier about the procurement of rolling stock. I am interested in hearing what you think should come out of the HST replacement process. What should we be procuring? I am also interested in hearing any thoughts that you and Gordon Martin have about how that process could be better.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
Jackson Cullinane and Stephen Smellie, I will bring you in on this. As I understand it, one of the big issues to do with the municipalisation of bus companies is the purchasing of rolling stock and bus stations and bringing all those assets into public ownership. Is there a read-across to other ways to procure green bonds when we are looking at the municipalisation of bus services? I can certainly see that being a real barrier for councils or other bodies that are set up to deliver municipalisation.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
Thank you, convener. I am an honorary associate member of the British Veterinary Association, I have an entry in the Scottish poultry register and I am a beekeeper, if that is in any way relevant.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
On the back of that, I am interested to know whether you think that there should be some form of non-regression provision in the bill. We might be talking about a vulnerable species with a poor conservation status, and there might be a very restricted range—it might be the last habitat. It would seem that a non-regression provision could apply quite well in such situations. What Grant Moir is describing is more of a landscape-scale restoration scenario whereby there is a need for flexibility around different habitats and species. Is there a bottom line, and does the bill get it right? Should there be something in the bill that articulates non-regression in a way that protects the bottom line for species recovery?