Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 1 July 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2999 contributions

|

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 11 June 2025

Mark Ruskell

I know that you would not want to comment on the Lomond Banks development itself. However, that particular issue is an example in which a development is in contravention of a park plan but the decision making over it happens elsewhere, and even the process of gathering the evidence and having a discussion and a determination on it is not necessarily guaranteed in the planning system. It feels as if the park authority has planning powers but it is really just the same as any other local authority, and ministers can call things in. There is not necessarily a requirement for a public local inquiry if something is in contravention of a park plan, so I come back to that question about its primacy.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Galloway and Ayrshire National Park Proposal

Meeting date: 11 June 2025

Mark Ruskell

There were reports of some intimidatory tactics at the Galloway meetings, particularly from those who were opposed to the park. I do not know what lessons can be learned from that about how the public narrative plays out. Similar concerns were raised during the earlier bid process about aggressive tactics being used around Scotland. What is the Government’s reflection on that?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Galloway and Ayrshire National Park Proposal

Meeting date: 11 June 2025

Mark Ruskell

My next question is about where the Government will go next with the policy on national parks. Two other bids—Lochaber and Tay forest—met the appraisal criteria. Perth and Kinross Council led an extensive consultation process for Tay forest, which showed that there was a large majority of support for a national park in the area. You said that the rejection of Galloway as a site for a national park focused on the lack of public support. One area has public support and meets the criteria, so what is the future for a national park in Tay forest? It appears to have everything on the table.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 11 June 2025

Mark Ruskell

Would that cultural development include local food cultures as well? Obviously, one of the concerns around new national parks is what they do for food production and the food economy. Could a park bring out a cultural element and that tradition aspect to food marketing under that aim?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 11 June 2025

Mark Ruskell

Okay. Thank you. That is making me hungry.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 11 June 2025

Mark Ruskell

You would expect the guidance for land management plans to reference park plans when they exist, obviously, and that someone who was producing a land management plan would need to refer to what was in the national park plan in their area.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 10 June 2025

Mark Ruskell

It depends on the nature of the business. Ultimately, it is about having a deterrent. You have moved an amendment that suggests that the figure should be £500—well, £500 is very little next to the cost of producing a land management plan. We have to consider the context. We took evidence in the committee that suggested that some land management plans may cost several thousand pounds to produce—perhaps upwards of £10,000 or £15,000—although that depends on the guidance, and we do not have the guidance yet, so we are not sure what an LMP will look like for a large estate or a smaller estate.

There would be a way to avoid having an LMP if we accepted your amendment to pitch the fine at £500. I think that £40,000 is within the limit of something that the commissioner could do, which is why it is pitched at that limit. A fine of that nature would provide a deterrent. I hope that no one would ever get a fine, because, instead, they would do the easy, obvious thing, which is to comply with the legislation by having the conversation with the community and laying out their plans for the future. It should be a positive thing.

I will leave it there.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 10 June 2025

Mark Ruskell

I have a fair bit to say in the next section, and I think that others will also want to contribute. I am also aware that we are starting a stage 3 in the chamber at the back of two. Let us leave it there.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 10 June 2025

Mark Ruskell

How confusing.

Amendment 5 would establish a 500 hectare threshold. We debated that issue in group 3 last week. I will not be moving that amendment on behalf of Ariane Burgess.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 10 June 2025

Mark Ruskell

I am sorry. I did not realise that this was an intervention; I thought that it was my opportunity to contribute.