Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 8 July 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2389 contributions

|

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 November 2024

Mark Ruskell

Is it the view of the Scottish Government that the adoption of this kind of simpler environmental outcomes report regime knocks us out of alignment with the European Union, or is it too early to tell that at the moment?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 November 2024

Mark Ruskell

Thanks. My last question is on strategic environmental assessment, which relates to plans and programmes. I know that, in its second session, the Parliament passed an act to establish SEA, on the back of EU directives. If EORs are adopted, will SEA continue to apply to plans and programmes in relation to energy developments under sections 36 and 37 of the 1989 act? If we are looking at a programme of offshore wind development, will the whole plan of multiple developments remain subject to SEA?

10:00  

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 November 2024

Mark Ruskell

So, there remains consistency across the UK for the strategic assessment of plans and programmes, regardless of where the constitutional boundaries are drawn.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Appointment of the Scottish Land Commissioners and the Tenant Farming Commissioner

Meeting date: 12 November 2024

Mark Ruskell

Thanks for coming along. How do you see the Scottish Land Commission developing? Do you have a collective view on that? I am interested in your working relationships. I do not know whether you have had working relationships in the past or whether you have thoughts collectively about how you will work together with the other commissioners, and I am interested in exploring that. It is not a trick question—it is just an open question about how you see yourselves working collectively and how you think that that will change.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Appointment of the Scottish Land Commissioners and the Tenant Farming Commissioner

Meeting date: 12 November 2024

Mark Ruskell

Robert, the farming commissioner role is embedded in the Land Commission, but how do you interpret that role within the commission’s wider work? Will you be following Bob McIntosh’s example, or will there be changes?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 12 November 2024

Mark Ruskell

I see that Michael McLeod wants to come in.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 5 November 2024

Mark Ruskell

How should good practice be codified? Should it be in the legislation or in guidance, or should we expect that to evolve?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 5 November 2024

Mark Ruskell

Jon Hollingdale, do you want to come in?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 5 November 2024

Mark Ruskell

Jon Hollingdale, do you want to come in?

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 5 November 2024

Mark Ruskell

We have discussed sites of community significance. When Josh Doble mentioned that, I could not help thinking about the Taymouth castle estate. It is relatively small, but there is a huge amount of community interest in the assets, and other such examples have been mentioned in evidence. Is there a way in which we can define such things in the bill? It feels as though it is open to a lot of interpretation, but a way forward could be to say, “This is a hugely significant asset to the community, so aspects of the bill should apply”. I am tempted to go along that line, but I am interested in how we would define it. As with the definition of “community”, we could get into a bit of a grey area.