The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2436 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Mark Ruskell
Is there a time horizon, rather than a date, by which you expect to be in compliance with that important international treaty on the environment?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Mark Ruskell
If there is a date for that, it would be useful for this committee and the compliance committee to know what it is.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Mark Ruskell
Right. What about the outcome of that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Mark Ruskell
Okay—I think that we have done that question. Great.
I want to return to an issue that we talked about a lot in the predecessor committee when the UK Withdrawal from the European Union (Continuity) (Scotland) Bill was going through Parliament: that is ESS’s role in relation to individual cases. There is a slight difference in the way that that has landed. The Office for Environmental Protection in England has the ability to investigate individual cases, but we still do not have that in ESS’s role. You advised ESS
“that it should give further consideration to the conditions where it would be appropriate to investigate the individual circumstances of a local area”.
It sounds to me as though you are giving ESS, even within the context of the 2021 act as it stands, a bit of a nudge towards something.
Have you anything more to say about how you define that? It is an area that NGOs and communities are interested in. Part of the context is that not everybody will have an environmental issue that is replicable in other areas of Scotland. One of ESS’s first cases was to look at acoustic deterrent devices at fish farms. That was an issue from around the coast of Scotland in which various communities were concerned. However, I guess that not every community will have an issue that is replicable—it might have more of a stand-alone individual case.
I am trying to read into that comment from the Government what you would like ESS to explore and where we might end up after that strategic review.
10:00Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Mark Ruskell
I want to ask about Aarhus convention compliance. Is there any sanction for not meeting the terms of that important international agreement? The Government was not in compliance in October. I think that that was the most recent deadline that passed. What happens now, as a result? Is it just a bit embarrassing, or do you work towards some strict monitoring deadline that is enforceable through the convention? Will you explain to me how that works, because—
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 December 2024
Mark Ruskell
The conversation about new crofts is tantalising. The committee recently held a meeting in Perthshire, where there was a lot of interest in forest crofts, and Forestry and Land Scotland is doing some work that is particularly exciting for young people.
Andrew Thin, you mentioned national parks. Would any reform of the powers or functions of the national parks be required in order to deliver more crofts within the park areas? We have only two current national parks, but a third one may be on the way.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Mark Ruskell
Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Mark Ruskell
I recognise that there are different views within the community. Perhaps what unites them is the need for transparency and, at the moment, there is not a clear vision of what a long-term management plan for the village, for the estate and for Glen Lyon will look like. Do you acknowledge that it would benefit both sides of the debate to understand what the estate will achieve in 30, 40 or 50 years’ time?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Mark Ruskell
I am interested in the link between local place plans and the public consultation process in the planning system on one side, and land management plans on the other. Andy Wightman, you have already said that those will be controlled and steered by private interests and that land agents will be involved. Should those two things work together and how would we get them to do so?
I am thinking of the example of Taymouth castle, where the estate would currently not even fall within the provisions for land management plans but where some people in Kenmore and Aberfeldy are concerned that the estate has in effect aggregated a range of assets—some urban and some in the wider estate—and there is a lack of transparency about long-term plans for housing and land management. There is a mixture of issues, some of which might be part of a land management plan if the estate were eligible for that while others would be in the local place plan. I am interested in how, from the community perspective, we join up those two things.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 3 December 2024
Mark Ruskell
Is the bill in the same position as the Crofting Reform (Scotland) Bill was in 2005? Does the Government need to reflect on it?