The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3036 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
To what extent is SEPA able or willing to make such recommendations? If you see that improvements are needed to local authority waste collection or that there needs to be more of an emphasis on the producer, how confident do you feel, as the regulator enacting and upholding the regulations, that you are able to make that case? Are you reliant on Environmental Standards Scotland and others to come to conclusions about what needs to change, because, ultimately, that is not your role?
When SEPA has given evidence to the committee in the past, I have felt a reluctance on your part to talk about whether the regulations or the laws are actually fit for purpose, perhaps because you do not see that as your role. However, I am just going to push the boundaries today and see what you are prepared to say. After all, this kind of waste is a very visible problem in Scotland, and I am interested to know how you will fix it. Indeed, you have given an inkling of that already.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
You mentioned a commitment to deliver a pilot for a cap on bus fares. You said that the areas have not yet been chosen, but is that the tone of the conversation with the industry? I know that that will be only a pilot and that it will not be nationwide, but it could be significant if the companies also actually invest in opportunities in those areas.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 25 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
Okay—so there is active work to develop a new code of practice for agriculture in relation to ammonia?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
We have had evidence from the Scottish Land Commission and a lot of stakeholders that focuses on the thresholds in the bill and where to draw the line. The Land Commission has made a very clear recommendation that all thresholds need to come in at 1,000 hectares. We have had practical examples of where a significant landholding, such as the Taymouth Castle estate, has had a big impact on surrounding communities and where there has been a lack of transparency over the long-term objectives for that land. Stakeholders have raised the fact that having transparency through a land management plan would be beneficial in that case, yet Taymouth Castle would currently sit outwith the provisions of the bill.
I am interested in your reflections on the evidence that we have heard, and particularly on the conclusion that 1,000 hectares is a more appropriate threshold than the current one.
09:45Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
Would you say that the resources that you currently have as an organisation are adequate?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
I will move on to lotting. I understand the interaction between the two things, but there is a concern that new owners could just combine land that has been lotted under a ministerial decision. Concern was raised around natural capital projects, with major investors perhaps seeing small parcels of land and deciding to buy them. What is your answer to that concern?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
Thank you.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
However, if good practice has been stuck to, you would not envisage that being part of a compensation claim.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
Do you believe that that issue has been largely resolved or is in the process of being resolved and that a legislative change is therefore not required?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Mark Ruskell
Yes, I am content to agree to it. We are where we are. However, there is a risk of the regulation having to be brought back again, for the Government to amend the amendment on the basis of there having been another international conversation. It seems like a bit of a waste of time.