The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3214 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 October 2025
Mark Ruskell
At long last, the Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill has been introduced in the Parliament, and not a moment too soon, because we are deeper than ever in the nature emergency. We all know that Scotland’s nature is in crisis and that one in nine of Scotland’s species is at risk of extinction. Conservation of what we have left is important, but we need to move beyond drawing lines on maps. Now is the time for the biggest restoration of our land and seas in our nation’s history.
I am excited about what restoration means for species and habitats that will be able to connect, expand and thrive. I am also excited for people—especially a generation of young people—who deserve the opportunity to make their mark on our nation’s story, to help to restore and revive our land and seas, to plant and nurture the future and to shift Scotland’s environmental baselines up instead of down.
This is the moment to ensure that action for nature is given parity with the drive to achieve net zero. They are two sides of the same coin. That need for action should be reflected in the bill’s title. Arguably, it should be a nature emergency bill that is rooted in action and restoration, not only in conservation.
Green members are glad to see legally binding targets for nature recovery being introduced, which is what the Greens pushed for when we were in government. At the committee, we heard many supportive arguments for targets from academics, NGOs and the land management and infrastructure sectors. It is clear that a rudderless, voluntary approach has not worked—it has not brought the focus that is needed in a nature emergency.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Mark Ruskell
Okay. I go back to my question about alignment between ETS policy development and the measures that are in the bill. What does that conversation look like for you as an operator on one side of the table? Do the calculations on economic impacts or other particular choices get discussed, or are they developed in isolation?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Mark Ruskell
Again, that is useful. As a business that supplies a lifeline service to remote and island communities, do you distinguish between the lifeline flights and financial measures such as the air departure tax on those flights, and other parts of your business, including supplying the tourism market, which creates the economic demand for aviation and routes?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Mark Ruskell
Is that distinction between wants and needs reflected in Government policy and the jet zero strategy? We acknowledge that demand reduction will inevitably be part of the picture in the future, but is there enough of a distinction between lifeline flights and flights for people who might find it desirable to have four holidays a year—although that is probably beyond most people’s means? It is, however, absolutely critical to be able to travel to an NHS appointment, for example.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Mark Ruskell
That is useful to know.
The modelling that we have had in front of us suggests that the bill’s provisions would add about £1.50 to an average ticket price. Is that your understanding of the revenue impact?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Mark Ruskell
Yes, if it is an airport coffee.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Mark Ruskell
In part, convener, but I want to come back on Ralph Lavery’s comments about the United Kingdom emissions trading scheme.
Ralph, perhaps you can explain further, because I am struggling to understand how the ETS will work alongside the measures that are in the bill in order to assist the roll-out of SAF. It would be good if you could offer some views on that, in particular in relation to the current change in the ETS with the withdrawal of the free allocation for aviation. That would be useful; I will probably ask Simon McNamara to come in as well.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Mark Ruskell
Has there been enough alignment between the development of the bill and the on-going policy discussions and decisions that are being made on the UK ETS and now, presumably, the European Union ETS?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Mark Ruskell
Is there not a fifth one—demand reduction?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 October 2025
Mark Ruskell
That is all useful. Thank you.
11:00