The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3552 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Mark Ruskell
Are we getting the most value from that investment in young people? Could we not use the concessionary travel scheme to encourage a modal shift? Should the Government not be leading on issues such as workplace travel planning and car use reduction for whole families? The Government could use the availability of the concessionary travel scheme for families to drive that shift. It feels as though the scheme sits in isolation. What the scheme is achieving is great, but I could see it being much more powerful if it were linked to other agendas in the climate change plan, for example.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Mark Ruskell
There is a collection of pilot projects and approaches that are happening in some areas, but I am not getting a sense of the overall approach. We are talking about a big amount of money to be invested. I see the benefit that concessionary travel is delivering for young people, but I do not see it building into the need for modal shift and the choices that families are making. I feel that the Government could do more to market it and link it to colleges and universities, and other workplaces, where there is a need to tackle car usage and get modal shift. I am not seeing it as a centrepiece of the Government’s programme to drive that modal shift.
The Government has set an ambitious target for a 20 per cent reduction in vehicle mileage; it has walked back from that, but at the same time we have £450 million going into concessionary travel. I am not seeing the strategic foundation for that.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Mark Ruskell
Thanks for that. You are confirming that the bus infrastructure fund is £60 million. The Confederation of Passenger Transport said recently on social media that it was £60 million, but you can confirm that it will be £60 million within the wider budget line.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Mark Ruskell
Is that enough for the whole of Scotland?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Mark Ruskell
I assume that there will be transnational shipments between the EU and Scotland at some point.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Mark Ruskell
I am thinking about electronics and other resources that have a bigger supply chain.
12:30
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Mark Ruskell
That raises the issue of multiyear budgets and investment in infrastructure and active travel, for which demand management measures can supply one source of revenue. What is your thinking on providing certainty for capital investment in active travel over time? There have been calls to move away from one-year budgets and seeing what is in the budget from one year to the next towards longer-term investment programmes so that we can get the supply chain moving. That would provide confidence for contractors that they can move fully into infrastructure.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Mark Ruskell
We have talked about the role of travel demand management in surface transport, but I see no such approach in relation to aviation. Is that just in the box marked “too politically difficult”? How are you leading that conversation? After all, you cannot ignore the fact that aviation is a major contributor to emissions, and there is nothing in the plan that suggests what the reduction in those emissions is going to be. I have to presume that other sectors will just have to pick up the slack.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Mark Ruskell
I am interested in the specific active travel component of that budget line, which has incorporated other things in recent years. I am trying to isolate what was spent last year and to establish whether there has been an increase.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 February 2026
Mark Ruskell
I am concerned about the transparency around that. You mention the bus infrastructure fund, but I am specifically asking about active travel and the infrastructure projects. Are you saying that you cannot disaggregate the spend on those things? It should be fairly easy to point to a bus lane as compared with a cycle—