The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3036 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
Thank you, convener. I am an honorary associate member of the British Veterinary Association, I have an entry in the Scottish poultry register and I am a beekeeper, if that is in any way relevant.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
On the back of that, I am interested to know whether you think that there should be some form of non-regression provision in the bill. We might be talking about a vulnerable species with a poor conservation status, and there might be a very restricted range—it might be the last habitat. It would seem that a non-regression provision could apply quite well in such situations. What Grant Moir is describing is more of a landscape-scale restoration scenario whereby there is a need for flexibility around different habitats and species. Is there a bottom line, and does the bill get it right? Should there be something in the bill that articulates non-regression in a way that protects the bottom line for species recovery?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
How would you fund that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
Let us go back to the wider purpose of the bill and the nature emergency. Do national parks have the appropriate powers and the appropriate support from the Scottish Government to enable you to deliver on those objectives?
I will give a brief example. At the weekend, I was walking in Tyndrum, up at Coille Coire Chuilc, which is an amazing fragment of Caledonian Scots pinewood with lots of veteran trees, but the forest is dying. Sheep wander around and there are too many deer. I find it incredible that that is happening in a national park.
What powers do you have to turn that around? It would be an option in the bill to give national parks proactive management powers to require landowners to do things. I am not seeing that coming through. This is your opportunity to reflect on that and say whether you think that everything is fine, that you or others have appropriate powers and can take enforcement action and that we will move towards restoring nature in the parks. It is also your opportunity to say whether you think that more funding or extra powers are needed or whether there is something else that the Scottish Government can do to ensure that the vision for nature in the parks is being delivered. From what I see on the ground, that is not being delivered in enough areas.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
What fixed-penalty notice powers would you ideally have? Would you like, for example, car parking enforcement?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
I have a question about the target areas that are not included in the bill. The advisory group originally recommended targets on positive outcomes for biodiversity from public sector and Government policy—for example, on investment in nature. Do you have a view on those areas? Do you already set targets in those areas?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
Does Mark Lodge have anything to add?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
The bill will change the duty on relevant public bodies. Currently, they have to “have regard to” national park plans, which will shift towards a duty to “facilitate the implementation of” the plans. I am interested in the perspectives of all three of you about what might change as a result of that.
Grant, I am aware of the long and difficult history with Highlands and Islands Enterprise in relation to the management of Cairngorm mountain. I am aware that there might be tensions in relation to Forestry and Land Scotland and that there are definitely tensions in the Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park and perhaps further afield. What will change as a result of the wording changing from “have regard to” to “facilitate the implementation of”?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
How will that change the dynamic in relation to HIE specifically? In your example, you are talking about areas in which there is already a degree of consensus—changes that need to happen with deer management—so you are pushing public agencies to deliver similar objectives. I am interested in the areas in which there might be tension between a commercial interest and the aims of the park. Will the change in the law change that dynamic?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Mark Ruskell
Mark, what does this look like from a local authority perspective?