Seòmar agus comataidhean

Without the right to work, people who are seeking asylum in Scotland are being forced into poverty. Although the architect of this hostile environment is undoubtedly the UK Government, we need to use all of our powers here in Scotland to counter that. The Scottish Government has promised to roll out free bus travel to people seeking asylum, who are, of course, unable to work. However, we have been waiting and talking about that for two years, and we are yet to see any progress on its delivery.

The excessive cost of transport directly contributes to poverty. I know that the minister knows that. Free bus travel would remove that financial strain and help to reduce poverty. As the launch of that scheme is now anticipated, will the minister confirm that it will be delivered before the end of this parliamentary session?

I will leave the party politics out of it for a moment and ask the Deputy First Minister how we can support the workforce. There is a need to retain the workforce, and there may also be a need for retraining, particularly in the short term. I am aware that Forth Valley College has received some funding support from the UK and Scottish Governments to help the Grangemouth workers to retrain and move into sustainable jobs for the future. What kind of discussions has the DFM had with Forth Valley College about supporting the Alexander Dennis workers?

Could I ask Douglas Lumsden to clarify something when he winds up? Is the amendment only about overhead lines? Over the years, I have spoken to a number of farmers who have gas pipelines going through their farms, and that has, at times, had quite a significant impact on the productivity of the soil. Sometimes it takes many decades for that soil to lose its compacted, degraded state and to return to productivity. I am not entirely sure where the fixation on overhead lines is coming from, given that lots of energy infrastructure can pass over farmland and might well have a significant impact on an agricultural tenant.

I reflect on the fact that the alternative to pylons is undergrounding, and in that case you are talking about motorway-sized trenches potentially going through sites of special scientific interest and special areas of conservation and running across riverbeds.

Energy infrastructure has an impact. I am just not sure why overhead lines are being targeted—well, I kind of know why they are being targeted, but I am just making the case. I am speaking up for the environment and the productivity of our farmland, which appears to have been ignored in the amendment, but maybe I am wrong.

Excuse me—I am choking on my sandwich. My understanding is that, in the past, there has been informal culling of goats in those communities. Despite the fact that this natural capital company is now applying for a formal licence to do this, my understanding, which might or might not be correct, is that there has, traditionally, been some culling of goats in the area.

Like the cabinet secretary, I think that you make a very strong case for having land management plans. I note that some of your Conservative colleagues are not supportive of the bill’s provisions on such plans, whereas Scottish Greens want to see them strengthened.

Oxygen Conservation has a number of estates around Scotland. For example, the committee has been to see the Invergeldie estate near Comrie, where community consultation is now on a better footing, as it is at Dorback estate in the Cairngorms.

When a new landowner with specific objectives comes into a community, they need to have an important conversation about species management and to carry out consultation with the community—with the people who have lived in the area for many years, who understand local traditions and the way in which land is managed there. The landowner needs to reflect that conversation in a land management plan. I think that strength comes from having such transparency.

If there are specific issues about culling, the number of animals that need to be culled, the traditions around that and the extent of it, those are exactly the issues that we need to see reflected in land management plans, and such plans really are a tool that can be used to crack them.

Convener?

Yes.

I am interested in your various sectors’ views on the proposed Rosyth-Dunkirk ferry. Could that be beneficial for trade? How might having an SPS agreement help with location of border control posts—or might it even make some of those posts irrelevant? Would it help with achieving frictionless trade? Would it help to get the case for the ferry over the line if the agreement were to be implemented?

On the point about cost reduction, are you disappointed that there was not, in the agreement, something on free movement of labour? Presumably—as you have already indicated, I think—free movement of labour benefits you in terms of jobs in processing and other jobs?

We have talked about the need for flexibility in responding to opportunities and the need to look at processing. What are your thoughts on the UK Government’s announcement of the £360 million fishing and coastal growth fund? Where should that fund be prioritised, and what will the outcome be?

Do you think that we could see an increase in the Scottish fleet or increased investment in processing? What discussions have you had about that already, and what do you anticipate or hope will come out of the fund?